2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2720965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer Learning With Neural Networks for Bearing Fault Diagnosis in Changing Working Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
153
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
153
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], a method based on neural network by using transferring parameters is proposed and success for diagnosing two datasets including 6 kinds of health conditions sampled from different fault diameters (BF IF OF with fault size being 0.007 in and 0.021 in) with the same motor load and speed (L0), and it focuses on fault diagnosis between two kinds of fault diameters under the same working conditions. In addition, unlike our method, it should be noted that a small amount of labeled data in test domain is needed when training modified neural networks, while our method does not need labeled test data during the training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [14], a method based on neural network by using transferring parameters is proposed and success for diagnosing two datasets including 6 kinds of health conditions sampled from different fault diameters (BF IF OF with fault size being 0.007 in and 0.021 in) with the same motor load and speed (L0), and it focuses on fault diagnosis between two kinds of fault diameters under the same working conditions. In addition, unlike our method, it should be noted that a small amount of labeled data in test domain is needed when training modified neural networks, while our method does not need labeled test data during the training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the fault diameter and categories are not changed, the distribution differences between training data (training domain) and test data (test domain) changes with working condition vary. As a direct result, the classifier can achieve high accuracy on training domain while performing poorly on test domain [14]. This is caused by distribution differences between two domains, since features extracted from one domain can not represent for another domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To enhance the accuracy of fault detection, statistics methods should be based on the frequency spectrum to reduce false and missing alarms [12]. Alternatively, machine learning methods, namely support vector machine (SVM) [13,14], decision tree (DT) [15], and various neural network architectures [16,17] combined with advanced signal processing can be used to find the complex relations on the feature space by using predefined time-frequency features, being based on fault characteristic frequencies. However, without the characteristic frequencies, the mentioned methods have great difficulty in classifying bearing faults [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using transfer learning (TL) allows us to reduce the time and complexity of generating features for fault classification. Further, TL is very helpful for a bearing fault diagnosis if the available data for training and validation are limited in industry [16]. Within this work, a pretrained version of the well-known AlexNet convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture [19] is applied to CWT spectrograms of vibration and acoustic emission signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%