“…The principal future goal should not be the achievement of SoTA performance on a single benchmark database. It is more important (and will yield more practical applications) to consider other materials [including additional polymers, biologically active materials (e.g., drugs), and catalysts] . ,, The properties of these materials should be predicted by transferring the physically informed ML models, such as our QDF, electron density–based ML, , molecular orbital–based ML (MOB-ML), − and differential Kohn–Sham ML models and , training them on various quantum-chemical property databases, such as PubChemQC, tmQM, Alchemy, and others . ,, The key questions are as follows: (1) On what data (e.g., excited states) do we train a physically informed ML model? (2) What data (e.g., catalysis) do we transfer and predict with the trained ML model?…”