2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2016.7493483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer learning of a convolutional neural network for HEp-2 cell image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many works add features derived from deep networks to existing feature sets or compare (2013) Detection of basal cell carcinoma H&E Convolutional auto-encoder neural network Malon and Cosatto (2013) Mitosis detection H&E Combines shapebased features with CNN Wang et al (2014) Mitosis detection H&E Cascaded ensemble of CNN and handcrafted features Ferrari et al (2015) Bacterial colony counting Culture plate CNN-based patch classifier Ronneberger et al (2015) Cell segmentation EM U-Net with deformation augmentation Shkolyar et al (2015) Mitosis detection Live-imaging CNN-based patch classifier Song et al (2015) Segmentation of cytoplasm and nuclei H&E Multi-scale CNN and graph-partitioning-based method Xie et al (2015a) Nucleus detection Ki-67 CNN model that learns the voting offset vectors and voting confidence Xie et al (2015b) Nucleus detection H&E, Ki-67 CNN-based structured regression model for cell detection Akram et al (2016) Cell segmentation FL, PC, H&E fCNN for cell bounding box proposal and CNN for segmentation Albarqouni et al (2016) Mitosis detection H&E Incorporated 'crowd sourcing' layer into the CNN framework Bauer et al (2016) Nucleus classification IHC CNN-based patch classifier Chen et al (2016b) Mitosis detection H&E Deep regression network (DRN) Gao et al (2016e) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Han et al (2016) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Janowczyk et al (2016b) Nucleus segmentation H&E Resolution adaptive deep hierarchical learning scheme Kashif et al (2016) Nucleus detection H&E Combination of CNN and hand-crafted features Mao and Yin (2016) Mitosis detection PC Hierarchical CNNs for patch sequence classification Mishra et al (2016) Classification of mitochondria EM CNN-based patch classifier Phan et al (2016) Nucleus classification FL Classification of Hep2-cells using transfer learning (pre-trained CNN) Romo-Bucheli et al (2016) Tubule nuclei detection H&E CNN-based classification of pre-selected candidate nuclei Sirinukunwattana et al (2016) Nucleus detection and classification H&E CNN with spatially constrained regression Song et al (2017) Cell segmentation H&E Multi-scale C...…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works add features derived from deep networks to existing feature sets or compare (2013) Detection of basal cell carcinoma H&E Convolutional auto-encoder neural network Malon and Cosatto (2013) Mitosis detection H&E Combines shapebased features with CNN Wang et al (2014) Mitosis detection H&E Cascaded ensemble of CNN and handcrafted features Ferrari et al (2015) Bacterial colony counting Culture plate CNN-based patch classifier Ronneberger et al (2015) Cell segmentation EM U-Net with deformation augmentation Shkolyar et al (2015) Mitosis detection Live-imaging CNN-based patch classifier Song et al (2015) Segmentation of cytoplasm and nuclei H&E Multi-scale CNN and graph-partitioning-based method Xie et al (2015a) Nucleus detection Ki-67 CNN model that learns the voting offset vectors and voting confidence Xie et al (2015b) Nucleus detection H&E, Ki-67 CNN-based structured regression model for cell detection Akram et al (2016) Cell segmentation FL, PC, H&E fCNN for cell bounding box proposal and CNN for segmentation Albarqouni et al (2016) Mitosis detection H&E Incorporated 'crowd sourcing' layer into the CNN framework Bauer et al (2016) Nucleus classification IHC CNN-based patch classifier Chen et al (2016b) Mitosis detection H&E Deep regression network (DRN) Gao et al (2016e) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Han et al (2016) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Janowczyk et al (2016b) Nucleus segmentation H&E Resolution adaptive deep hierarchical learning scheme Kashif et al (2016) Nucleus detection H&E Combination of CNN and hand-crafted features Mao and Yin (2016) Mitosis detection PC Hierarchical CNNs for patch sequence classification Mishra et al (2016) Classification of mitochondria EM CNN-based patch classifier Phan et al (2016) Nucleus classification FL Classification of Hep2-cells using transfer learning (pre-trained CNN) Romo-Bucheli et al (2016) Tubule nuclei detection H&E CNN-based classification of pre-selected candidate nuclei Sirinukunwattana et al (2016) Nucleus detection and classification H&E CNN with spatially constrained regression Song et al (2017) Cell segmentation H&E Multi-scale C...…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the leave-one-donor-out test principle [31,38], we wanted the selection of the optimal hyperparameters to be generalizable to new donors as well. Therefore, we applied a nested cross-validation scheme [55,55,56] (Figure 8).…”
Section: Nested Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trained model must be able to generalize to new donors in order to be useful in a practical pre-clinical or clinical setting. Therefore, all of our evaluation strategies train on images from some donors and evaluate the trained models on separate images from a different donor, which is referred to as subject-wise cross-validation 34 or a leave-one-patient-out scheme 28 . We initially assess the classifiers with cross-validation across donors.…”
Section: /29mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the leave-one-donor-out test principle 28,34 , we wanted the selection of the optimal hyper-parameters to be generalizable to new donors as well. Therefore, we applied a nested cross-validation scheme 51,52 (Fig.…”
Section: Nested Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%