2024
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01232-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer learning–based PET/CT three-dimensional convolutional neural network fusion of image and clinical information for prediction of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma

Xiaonan Shao,
Xinyu Ge,
Jianxiong Gao
et al.

Abstract: Background To introduce a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) leveraging transfer learning for fusing PET/CT images and clinical data to predict EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Methods Retrospective data from 516 LADC patients, encompassing preoperative PET/CT images, clinical information, and EGFR mutation status, were divided into training (n = 404) and test sets (n = 112). Several deep learning models were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the previous study, Shao et al (2024) [ 51 ] used a pre-trained CNN model to identify the EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. They used patients’ positron emission tomography (PET)/CT images as input data for a pre-trained 3D CNN model.…”
Section: Mutation Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the previous study, Shao et al (2024) [ 51 ] used a pre-trained CNN model to identify the EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. They used patients’ positron emission tomography (PET)/CT images as input data for a pre-trained 3D CNN model.…”
Section: Mutation Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUROC of the models trained from scratch was 0.544 (input data was CT) and 0.573 (input data was PET). Compared with models with similar input data but that had been pre-trained (AUROC of 0.701 when using CT images as input and 0.645 when using PET images), the former approaches had a lower performance [ 51 ].…”
Section: Mutation Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%