2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10051804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer Learning Algorithm of P300-EEG Signal Based on XDAWN Spatial Filter and Riemannian Geometry Classifier

Abstract: The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in the brain–computer interface (BCI) has suffered great cross-subject variability. The BCI system needs to be retrained before each time it is used, which is a waste of resources and time. Thus, it is difficult to generalize a fixed classification method for all subjects. Therefore, the transfer learning method proposed in this article, which combines XDAWN spatial filter and Riemannian Geometry classifier (RGC), can achieve offline cross-subject transfer learning in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce its computational cost, He and Wu (2019) suggested using the Euclidean mean covariance matrix instead of the Riemannian mean covariance matrix. Li et al (2020) validated the xDAWN algorithm combined with Riemannian whitening for P300 datasets. Qi et al (2018) proposed a speedy calibration method with Riemannian geometry for P300 spellers by selecting related samples from the database.…”
Section: Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce its computational cost, He and Wu (2019) suggested using the Euclidean mean covariance matrix instead of the Riemannian mean covariance matrix. Li et al (2020) validated the xDAWN algorithm combined with Riemannian whitening for P300 datasets. Qi et al (2018) proposed a speedy calibration method with Riemannian geometry for P300 spellers by selecting related samples from the database.…”
Section: Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset used in this paper consists of EEG signals from a single session, which limits the experimental configurations and does not allow evaluation of whether we can create models for each subject from a certain session and be able to recognize the subjects or reject them using data from another session. Future steps will center the attention on tackling this problem and analyzing a possible way to use new correctly-classified instances to decrease session-to-session variability, as well as using and comparing current progress in transfer learning, using machine-/deep-learning methods for this problem 16,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain brain–computer interface (BCI) applications, the problem of recognizing new instances from new sessions has been studied using EEG data from different sessions or adding new instances for calibration. In the case of session-to-session or subject-to-subject transfer, the learning problem has been studied using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and SVM, based on motor imagery or P300 paradigms 34 , 43 46 . To adapt the EEG feature space and thus reduce session-to-session variability, we can use a data space adaptation method based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence criterion (Also called relative entropy), aiming to minimize the distribution of differences from the training session to a different session 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used classifiers include linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [16], support vector machine (SVM) [17], and Riemannian geometry classifier (RGC) [18], among others. Of these, the combination of XDAWN and RGC is perhaps the most potent approach for P300 detection [19], which exhibits a strong generalization capability for variable EEG signals. Nevertheless, it is still not as competitive as DL approaches [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%