2019
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2019.1644002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer interest: measuring interest in training content and interest in training transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another direction for future research concerns the examination of trainee reactions when the instructional design is systematically varied. For example, studies could compare knowledge‐centered and learner‐centered designs in webinars and measure satisfaction (Amhag, ; Ebner & Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al, ; Kanter et al , ), motivation (Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Gorges et al , ), achievement (Cook et al , ; Gegenfurtner & Ebner, ; Schmid et al , ), and transfer (Froehlich & Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Laine & Gegenfurtner, ; Reinhold et al , ). Finally, it would also be interesting to estimate, using the same questionnaire items, how the reactions to webinar instruction would compare with reactions to face‐to‐face classroom instruction, using different teaching modalities for content delivery (Cook et al , ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Liu et al , ; Means et al , ; Schmid et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another direction for future research concerns the examination of trainee reactions when the instructional design is systematically varied. For example, studies could compare knowledge‐centered and learner‐centered designs in webinars and measure satisfaction (Amhag, ; Ebner & Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al, ; Kanter et al , ), motivation (Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Gorges et al , ), achievement (Cook et al , ; Gegenfurtner & Ebner, ; Schmid et al , ), and transfer (Froehlich & Gegenfurtner, ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Laine & Gegenfurtner, ; Reinhold et al , ). Finally, it would also be interesting to estimate, using the same questionnaire items, how the reactions to webinar instruction would compare with reactions to face‐to‐face classroom instruction, using different teaching modalities for content delivery (Cook et al , ; Gegenfurtner et al , ; Liu et al , ; Means et al , ; Schmid et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been observed in different contexts and settings, such as writing (Albin, Benton, & Khramtsova, 1996), studying psychology (Harackiewicz, Durik, Barron, Linnenbrink & Tauer, 2008), learning statistics (Hay, Callingham & Carmichael, 2015), and reading science texts (Ainley, Hidi & Berndorff, 2002). In addition, interest has been found to have a positive connection with other motivational factors such as mastery goals (Harackiewicz et al, 2008), utility value (Gegenfurtner, Knogler & Schwab, 2020), and self-efficacy (Ainley, 2012).…”
Section: Interest and Learningmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It would be interesting to examine how stable or fluid individual transfer goals are as time after training unfolds. Finally, a third implication for future research concerns theory building to include transfer goals, goal orientations, and goal contents in the kaleidoscope of motivational variables to expand current conceptualizations of training motivation in research on human resource development (Beier and Kanfer, 2009; Colquitt et al., 2000; Elliot et al., 2011; Ford et al., 2018; Quesada-Pallarès and Gegenfurtner, 2015; Ryan and Deci, 2018) and to examine the nomological network between goal variables and other motivational predictors of training transfer, including training satisfaction, transfer interest, and the utility values of training and transfer (Ebner and Gegenfurtner, 2019; Gegenfurtner, 2019; Gegenfurtner et al., 2019a; Knogler et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%