2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer function analysis for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation using spontaneous oscillations in blood pressure and cerebral blood flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using standard procedures (Panerai et al 1998a, Zhang et al 1998, Panerai et al 1998b, Gommer et al 2010, Meel-van den Abeelen et al 2014b, Katsogridakis et al 2013, the coherence function, amplitude (gain) and phase frequency responses were calculated from the auto-and cross-spectra. The coherence function was visually inspected and TFA estimates were only accepted if the coherence was above 0.5 in the frequency range 0.15-0.25Hz where the BP-CBFV relationship can be assumed to be linear (Claassen et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using standard procedures (Panerai et al 1998a, Zhang et al 1998, Panerai et al 1998b, Gommer et al 2010, Meel-van den Abeelen et al 2014b, Katsogridakis et al 2013, the coherence function, amplitude (gain) and phase frequency responses were calculated from the auto-and cross-spectra. The coherence function was visually inspected and TFA estimates were only accepted if the coherence was above 0.5 in the frequency range 0.15-0.25Hz where the BP-CBFV relationship can be assumed to be linear (Claassen et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, most studies have enrolled a relatively small number of subjects which sets limits on the statistical reliability of results. Secondly, it has been nearly impossible to pool together different studies to increase the statistical power of estimates due to the considerable diversity of methods used by different centres (Meel-van den Abeelen et al 2014b). The recent proposal to improve standardisation of these methods (Claassen et al 2016, Meel-van den Abeelen et al 2014a, should bear fruit in the near future, but in the meantime alternative approaches are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time domain, the cerebrovascular adjustments to a change in blood pressure is considered as a function of time, and may be quantitated by a moving correlation coefficient, which is continually calculated between a CBF estimate and MAP over specified time intervals [5][6][7][8]. In the frequency domain, the ability of the cerebrovasculature to respond to blood pressure fluctuations that occur at different frequencies is addressed by TFA [4], which is a classical and currently the most widely used approach for investigating dCA in humans [3,32]. Despite fundamentally different methodologies, these previous studies all report that higher PaCO 2 levels are associated with progressively prolonged response times of the cerebrovasculature [4,7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined dCA by transfer function analysis (TFA) of spontaneous oscillations in MAP (as a surrogate for CPP) and MCAv (as a surrogate for CBF) [3,32]. Invasive arterial blood pressure and TCD-waveforms were recorded over a 20-min steady-state period and re-sampled at 10 Hz for spectral analysis.…”
Section: Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation