2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
45
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A thin endometrium it has been reported in 5 % of women <40 years of age and in 25 % of 41-45 years old women [18] and it has also been related to poor pregnancy outcome [20]. Regarding the etiology it is considered mainly idiopathic, however, a surgical complication postcurettage might be identified in some cases [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thin endometrium it has been reported in 5 % of women <40 years of age and in 25 % of 41-45 years old women [18] and it has also been related to poor pregnancy outcome [20]. Regarding the etiology it is considered mainly idiopathic, however, a surgical complication postcurettage might be identified in some cases [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While environmental differences are hypothesized to underlie the observed associations between clinic location and donor egg IVF success, a number of unquantified variables could very well explain the observed directionality of association. Regional practice differences in IVF protocols, such as choice of ovarian suppression strategy, gonadotropin type and dose, and peak estradiol levels prior to ET [49], donor characteristics such as age and sibling donor [50], as well as regional differences in donor egg recipient profiles such as obesity [51], uterine factor [52,53], presence of hydrosalpinges [54] and even vitamin D deficiency [55] could underlie the observed phenomenon. The publically accessible data reported by SART include cumulative annual data for the reporting clinics; details on individual egg donors and recipients are lacking; similarly, in the absence of information on timing of the undertaken ART cycle/s, any inference regarding site specific UVB values during the time of ART cycle, or effect of seasonality cannot be attained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of patient specific variables are recognized to adversely impact on the success of donor egg IVF [7][8][9][10], contributions of thus far unidentified influences that may modulate the likelihood for procreative success with the use of donor eggs remain a consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of quite a few published studies, the prognostic value of ultrasonographic endometrial thickness measurements (and other parameters) in predicting implantation and pregnancy rates remains controversial. Some investigators have demonstrated a positive correlation between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]11] while others have not found such an association [9,10,[12][13][14], or only in association with other parameters [15,16]. However, these differences may be in part attributed to different patient populations, stimulation protocols used or measurement timing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have shown that this parameter is important for predicting the outcome of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], other studies have failed to show such a positive relationship [9][10][11][12][13][14]. In a third category of studies the endometrial thickness was related to the IVF outcome, but only in correlation with other parameters [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%