2003
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2003.3.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer and complex oriented cohomology rings

Abstract: For finite coverings we elucidate the interaction between transferred Chern classes and Chern classes of transferred bundles. This involves computing the ring structure for the complex oriented cohomology of various homotopy orbit spaces. In turn these results provide universal examples for computing the stable Euler classes (i.e. T r * (1)) and transferred Chern classes for p-fold covers. Applications to the classifying spaces of p-groups are given.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following lemma is an easy consequence of the recursive formula for the FGL given in 4.3.9 of [9]. See [2], Lemma 5.3.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following lemma is an easy consequence of the recursive formula for the FGL given in 4.3.9 of [9]. See [2], Lemma 5.3.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As for [5,10], there the multiplicative structure is given completely but in terms of artificial generators not equal to Chern classes. Our aim here is to determine the aforementioned multiplicative structure completely in terms of Chern classes by applying the formula for transfer of the first Chern class along double coverings [2], [3].…”
Section: It Was Shown That K(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof Part (i) is stated in Bakuradze and Priddy [2,Lemma 5.3] and (ii) is claimed in Bakuradze and Vershinin [3, Lemma 2.2 (ii)], but, as the referee pointed out, the explanation provided there falls short of a full proof. We therefore give an argument which surely must be the one the authors of [3] had in mind.…”
Section: Some Formulasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We therefore give an argument which surely must be the one the authors of [3] had in mind. Since we need the notation anyway, we also show (i), the proof being essentially the one from [2].…”
Section: Some Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%