1997
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1997.2401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfection of Myoblasts in Primary Culture with Isomeric Cationic Cholesterol Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscope magnification: 100X. values are similar to those of cell lines such as A549 cells (Bischoff et al, 1997). No differences in gene transfer efficiency between healthy and dystrophic dog myoblasts were found (not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Microscope magnification: 100X. values are similar to those of cell lines such as A549 cells (Bischoff et al, 1997). No differences in gene transfer efficiency between healthy and dystrophic dog myoblasts were found (not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Most of the molecules are formulated together with the zwitterionic phospholipid dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) to enhance transfection. Differences in efficiency among cationic lipids have been reported depending on the cell type and the ratio between lipid and DNA (Felgner et al, 1994, Bischoff et al, 1997. In a more detailed study (Bischoff et al, 1997), we found that slight structural differences between cationic lipids led to significantly different transfection efficiencies for myoblasts in primary cultures, with implications for cell or organ targeting.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the literature contains conflicting reports in this area ( , ), accurate, unambiguous spectroscopic 1 H and 13 C assignments of our lipo-polyamines are essential. Therefore, we investigated the NMR of spermine 1 , and compared our data to the literature values and also to those calculated using additivity rules ( , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently C1, C2, and C3 are under the influence of a carbamate rather than a (protonated) primary amine, are relatively less deshielded, and therefore, come into resonance further upfield than their respective counterparts C12, C11, and C10 on the other propylene chain. During these studies, two other research groups have independently synthesized and published NMR assignments of this carbamate 13 (Table ) as its free base in CDCl 3 , but their assignments disagree with each other ( , ). Our assignments compare favorably with those of Bischoff et al (), with the differences in chemical shifts being attributable to a change in solvent and the protonation state of the polyamine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%