2005
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Biopsy: a Combined Approach in the Evaluation of Mediastinal Lesions

Abstract: EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA appear to be complementary methods. A combined approach with both EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA may be able to replace more invasive methods for evaluating lung cancer patients with suspected hilar or mediastinal metastases, as well as for evaluating unclear mediastinal or hilar lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
159
1
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
159
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in previous studies, there is no difference in yield or patient tolerance if the procedure is performed under moderate sedation or general anaesthesia [24]. Depending on the lymph node localisation, EBUS-TBNA seems at least comparable to the established EUS-FNA findings in the literature [15,27,28]. It is important to note that small lymph nodes are more difficult to identify with any imaging modality (including EBUS) and probably contain a small number of malignant cells, making a cytological diagnosis difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As reported in previous studies, there is no difference in yield or patient tolerance if the procedure is performed under moderate sedation or general anaesthesia [24]. Depending on the lymph node localisation, EBUS-TBNA seems at least comparable to the established EUS-FNA findings in the literature [15,27,28]. It is important to note that small lymph nodes are more difficult to identify with any imaging modality (including EBUS) and probably contain a small number of malignant cells, making a cytological diagnosis difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The majority of studies do not differentiate between these subgroups and this is an important drawback. Even though the current authors could find no observable differences in studies that exclusively enrolled patients with NSCLC [12,13,15,17] or that primarily analyse mediastinal and hilar metastasis [9,13,17,20] in comparison to those that include only patients with mediastinal metastases [12,18,24], additional studies are required to clarify the effectiveness of this test in different clinical situations.…”
Section: Generalisability Of the Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…EUS-FNA is a complementary technique that enables visualisation of posterior nodes not visualised by EBUS-TBNA but does not allow the visualisation of the anterior mediastinum [13,19]. Two studies [19,24] support the theory that the combination of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA could dispense with surgical techniques in the great majority of cases, but one of these studies includes only 20 patients [20] and the validity of both is diminished due to the lack of confirmation of all negative results using reference techniques such as mediastinoscopy and/or thoracoscopy. Additionally, WALLACE et al [19] used lymph nodes, instead of patients, as the unit of analysis, so the possibility that study results are inflated cannot be dismissed [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, EBUS-TBNA has been shown to be a safer, more sensitive, and cost effective diagnostic procedure. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]14,17,18 Clinical studies have shown that EBUS-TBNA has sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 84%-100%, 100%, and 100% and 67%-97%, respectively. [6][7][8][9]16,18 The optimal use of EBUS-TBNA depends on the effective collaboration between the cytopathologist and the endoscopist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Studies have also shown that EBUS-TBNA has a higher sensitivity and specificity than mediastinoscopy, EUS, and conventional TBNA in staging and diagnosing lung lesions. 3,4,5,13,14,16,17 Several types of specimens can be obtained with EBUS guidance, including needle aspiration, brushing, washing, lavage, and core needle biopsy. 4,6,7,19 Direct smears can be made from needle aspiration and brushing specimens to allow on-site evaluation.…”
Section: -10mentioning
confidence: 99%