2002
DOI: 10.1177/026119290203002s08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transepithelial Resistance and Inulin Permeability as Endpoints in In Vitro Nephrotoxicity Testing

Abstract: Transepithelial electrical resistance (RT) and the flux of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) across Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) strain 1 cells and porcine epithelial kidney (LLC-PK1) monolayers were compared between three laboratories for a range of nephrotoxins. The precision of the REMS AutoSampler was similar to that of the Ussing chamber and the ENDOHM® technique, but superior to using chopstick electrodes, for measurements of resistance. The nephrotoxins used were selective for the proximal tubule, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS, 1 mL) was placed inside the Endohm chamber, the culture inserted atop and 150 µL of PBS was added apically into the insert and the measurement taken. Prior to testing the cultures TEER an empty culture insert (containing 150 µL PBS) was used as a “blank” and subtracted from each subsequent sample reading 45. TEER measurements were taken on day 1 and every third day up to day 42 for all 3 donors A, B and C ( n = 3) and are presented as resistance values (in Ω · cm 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS, 1 mL) was placed inside the Endohm chamber, the culture inserted atop and 150 µL of PBS was added apically into the insert and the measurement taken. Prior to testing the cultures TEER an empty culture insert (containing 150 µL PBS) was used as a “blank” and subtracted from each subsequent sample reading 45. TEER measurements were taken on day 1 and every third day up to day 42 for all 3 donors A, B and C ( n = 3) and are presented as resistance values (in Ω · cm 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the latter was carried out primarily with a focus on transcriptomic, metabolomic, and proteomic approaches and not with a focus on functional characteristics. While functional readouts are commonly applied for the in vitro detection of neuro- (Hausherr et al 2014) or cardiotoxicity (Sirenko et al 2017), such approaches have so far been rarely applied for the detection of nephrotoxicity and, when applied, were basically limited to measurements of transepithelial electrical resistance (Duff et al 2002). Thus, in the present study, we investigated whether the combination of functional measurements, e.g., water reabsorption and cation secretion with classical cytotoxicity endpoints, while using a limited set of nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic reference substances, could provide for improved sensitivity in the detection of drug-induced nephrotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER sometimes results in inconsistent reports for TER readings within the same cell lines. For example, when using chopstick electrodes the TER values obtained were higher in A6 renal cells [11], MDCK strain 1 and LLCK1 porcine kidney cells [12] than those obtained using Endohm chambers. These higher values may be attributable to incorrect positioning of the chopstick electrodes, resulting in the subjection of cells to a non-uniform electrical field [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%