1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01062277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transepithelial potential difference in the proximal tubule of Necturus kidney

Abstract: Transepithelial potential difference (p.d.) was measured in the proximal tubule of Necturus kidney in vivo, by means of microelectrodes filled either with a 3M KClion or with a Ringer's solution for amphibians. The average transepithelial p.d., measured with KCl-tips, was: -1.4 +/- 2.4 mV (early convolutions), -0.1 +/- 2.0 mV (middle convolutions) and +0.1 +/- 2.4 mV (straight segment). The corresponding values obtained with Ringer's-filled microelectrodes were -2.3 +/- 1.8 mV, -1.3 +/- 1.1 mV and +0.1 +/- 1.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be recalled that the value of -0.8 mV is at variance with other reports on transepithelial p.d. To test whether this discrepancy is the result of some alteration of the tissue, due to the perfusion with artificial solutions, a thorough investigation was undertaken independently in the intact Necturus kidney; such experimental determinations, as well as various theoretical considerations fully support the present data (Edelman & Anagnostopoulos, 1975; also in preparation).…”
Section: Transepithelial Pdmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It should be recalled that the value of -0.8 mV is at variance with other reports on transepithelial p.d. To test whether this discrepancy is the result of some alteration of the tissue, due to the perfusion with artificial solutions, a thorough investigation was undertaken independently in the intact Necturus kidney; such experimental determinations, as well as various theoretical considerations fully support the present data (Edelman & Anagnostopoulos, 1975; also in preparation).…”
Section: Transepithelial Pdmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is generally acknowledged that the [C1]rj[C1]e ratio is slightly higher than unity, i.e., 1.05-1.07 (Walker, Hudson, Findler & Richards 1937;Bott, 1962), when [Na]~/[-Na]v is not significantly different from 1.00 (Bott, 1962;Garland et al, 1973). The lumen has been reported to be negative with respect to interstitium by 9 to 12mV (Boulpaep, 1972;Spring & Paganelli, 1972;Spring & Kimura, 1978) or by about 1 mV (Anagnostopoulos, 1975;Edelman & Anagnostopoulos, 1976). Clearly, luminal chloride concentration appears also to be above equilibrium, in Necturus, despite a reported lack of luminal acidification (Giebisch, 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were performed in the proximal tubule of Necturus kidney, in vivo. The kidney preparation for micropuncture was described elsewhere (Anagnostopoulos, 1975;Edelman & Anagnostopoulos, 1976). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, membrane p.d. in vivo has been found to be between -70 and -75 mV (Whittembury, Sugino & Solomon, 1961;Khuri et al 1972;Boulpaep, 1972;Edelman & Anagnostopoulos, 1976 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%