Transendothelial Transport: The Vesicle Controversy

Abstract

The relative contribution of transcytosis vs. large pore transport to the passage of macromolecules across microvascular endothelia has been a controversial issue for nearly half a century. To separate transcytosis from ‘porous’ transport, the transcytosis inhibitors N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and filipin have been tested in in situ or ex vivo perfused organs with highly conflicting results. In continually weighed isolated perfused organs, where measurements of pre- and post-capillary resistances, capillary pressure and capillary filtration coefficients can be repeatedly performed, high doses of NEM and filipin increased the bulk transport of macromolecules from blood to tissue, despite producing vasoconstriction. By contrast, in in situ perfused organs, marked reductions in the tissue uptake of albumin tracer have been observed after NEM and filipin. When tissue cooling has been employed as a means of inhibiting (active) transcytosis, results have invariably shown a low cooling sensitivity of albumin transport, compatible with passive transendothelial passage of albumin. This observation is further strengthened by the commonly observed dependence of albumin transport upon the capillary pressure and the rate of transcapillary convection. For low-density lipoprotein (LDL), a cooling-sensitive, non-selective transport component has been discovered, which may be represented by filtration through paracellular gaps, lateral diffusion through transendothelial channels formed by fused vesicles, or by transcytosis. From a physiological standpoint there is little evidence supporting active transendothelial transport of most plasma macromolecules. This seems to be supported by studies on caveolin-1-deficient mice lacking plasmalemmal vesicles (caveolae), in which there are no obvious abnormalities in the transendothelial transport of albumin, immunoglobulins or lipoproteins. Nevertheless, specific transport in peripheral capillaries of several hormones and other specific substances, similar to that existing across the blood-brain barrier, still remains as a possibility.

Direct Administration of Insulin Into Skeletal Muscle Reveals That the Transport of Insulin Across the Capillary Endothelium Limits the Time Course of Insulin to Activate Glucose Disposal

“…Nevertheless, the mechanism of transendothelial transport remains unclear; it occurs through either a receptormediated process or simple diffusion, and it is either paracellularly or transcellularly transported (35). Using bovine aortic endothelial cells in vitro, King et al (10) reported the transport to be a receptor-mediated, unidirectional process.…”

Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and degradation of connexin43 through spatially restricted autocrine/paracrine heparin-binding EGF

“…The exact mechanism of macromolecule transport into capillaries is unknown (18); however, it is most likely through diffusion, transcytosis, or a combination of the two. In the case of diffusion, the mass transfer coefficient governing the flux of HB-EGF through the capillary wall is coupled to the diffusivity of HB-EGF, whereas the terms are uncoupled for the case of transcytosis.…”

El Consumo De Frutas Y Hortalizas Ayuda a Prevenir El Daño Endotelial

“…Esta barrera semipermeable está formada por el complejo VE-caderina-catenina que forma las uniones intercelulares y que participa activamente en el control de la permeabilidad (36)(37)(38). El endotelio vascular transporta solutos con una gama de tamaños moleculares desde 0,1 nm (Na+1) a 11,5 nm (IgM) (39). El transporte a través del endotelio puede tener lugar por dos vías diferentes: a través de las CE (transporte transcelular) o entre las células adyacentes y a través de uniones interendoteliales (transporte paracelular).…”