1965
DOI: 10.1111/apm.1965.65.4.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRANSDUCTION OF THE MU‐FACTOR IN ESCHERICHIA COLI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R I confers resistance to streptomycin 128 pg./ml., but, at the same time, it can be seen greatly to increase the rate of appearance of highly streptomycin-resistant variants. Gundersen (1963Gundersen ( , 1965a and Ginoza & Painter (1964) observed what may be the same phenomenon, which was attributed to 'genetic instability' resulting from a 'mutator gene' present on an episome. The particular episome studied by Gundersen itself gave resistance to low concentrations of streptomycin (Gundersen, 1965 a), and Ginoza & Painter (1964) noted that the apparently mutagenic effect of R factors was limited to drugs where the R factor already conferred some degree of resistance.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…R I confers resistance to streptomycin 128 pg./ml., but, at the same time, it can be seen greatly to increase the rate of appearance of highly streptomycin-resistant variants. Gundersen (1963Gundersen ( , 1965a and Ginoza & Painter (1964) observed what may be the same phenomenon, which was attributed to 'genetic instability' resulting from a 'mutator gene' present on an episome. The particular episome studied by Gundersen itself gave resistance to low concentrations of streptomycin (Gundersen, 1965 a), and Ginoza & Painter (1964) noted that the apparently mutagenic effect of R factors was limited to drugs where the R factor already conferred some degree of resistance.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%