Transdisciplinary tools in modern urban planning theory (by the example of the concept of "urban vegetation")

Abstract

The changes in theoretical urban planning concepts under the influence of transdisciplinarity are investigated. On the example of the definition of "urban vegetation", the variability of the use of linguistic and content structures for its description is discussed. A brief review of texts illustrating the transition from the concept of "resource assessment" (which is centered on the analysis of the consumer value of individual natural components of the urban environment) to the concept of "anthropo-eco-system" (focused on a qualitative assessment of the current state of individual components of the system) is presented. The theme of natural components inherent in the past decades is giving way to a modern view of system components of various origins. The question is raised about the need to rethink a number of theoretical foundations of urban planning in order to deepen their internal links with the socio-economic and cultural agenda.

Модель Взаимосвязи Участников Профессиональной Деятельности В Градостроительстве

“…These trends were evident everywhere, and the urban planning system sought to capitalize on the moment rather than dominate private development interests. However, the global changes that have taken place over the last two decades 15 dictate new conditions and push the urban planning system to take a more powerful position and not allow the market to manipulate the process of urban change. In political aspirations to strengthen the balance in favour of the planner, the effects are not so noticeable, if not simply insignificant".…”

“…По рассматриваемой теме проработаны публикации , в том числе: Н.Н. Жеблиенок [15,16], К.В. Кияненко [17][18][19], А.В.…”

“…6 Том 13. Выпуск 3 (49) Строительство: наука и образование 15 Десятилетий (уточнение авторов статьи).…”

“…Эти тренды прослеживались повсеместно, а система градостроительного планирования стремилась использовать момент, а не доминировать в частных интересах развития. Однако глобальные перемены, произошедшие в течение двух последних декад 15 , диктуют новые условия и подталкивают систему градостроительства обрести более властную позицию и не позволять рынку манипулировать процессом городских перемен. В политических устремлениях усилить баланс в пользу планировщика, эффекты пока не столь заметны, если не сказать просто -невелики».…”

“…Publications have been worked out on the topic under consideration, including: N.N. Zheblienok [15,16], K.V. Kiyanenko [17][18][19], A.V.…”