2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdisciplinarity in land use science – A review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally, the term "transdisciplinarity" was introduced to further clarify the concept of "interdisciplinarity". The resulting notion of TDR as a "perfected interdisciplinarity" persists today, as particularly evidenced by regional differences between Europe and the US [47,60]. In the North American debate, the notion of TDR originated from the "taxonomy of cross disciplinary research" after Rosenfield [61] used the lexical morpheme "trans" to describe a collaborative research approach differing from interdisciplinarity in which researchers "work jointly but still from a disciplinary-specific basis" transcending disciplinary boundaries by "using shared conceptual framework drawing together disciplinary-specific theories, concepts, and approaches to address common problems".…”
Section: Integrating Knowledge From Different Disciplines (Interdiscimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, the term "transdisciplinarity" was introduced to further clarify the concept of "interdisciplinarity". The resulting notion of TDR as a "perfected interdisciplinarity" persists today, as particularly evidenced by regional differences between Europe and the US [47,60]. In the North American debate, the notion of TDR originated from the "taxonomy of cross disciplinary research" after Rosenfield [61] used the lexical morpheme "trans" to describe a collaborative research approach differing from interdisciplinarity in which researchers "work jointly but still from a disciplinary-specific basis" transcending disciplinary boundaries by "using shared conceptual framework drawing together disciplinary-specific theories, concepts, and approaches to address common problems".…”
Section: Integrating Knowledge From Different Disciplines (Interdiscimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics and challenges involved in this transdisciplinary approach have been scrutinized by Zscheischler and Rogga [28], who particularly emphasize the multiple interests involved, power inequalities and different disciplinary "languages". Box 1.…”
Section: Challenging a Plethora Of Perspectives On Approaches To Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most frequently, papers report on experiences from single projects and describe case studies while comparative or even quantifying research is still at its beginning (Schmid et al 2016;Zscheischler and Rogga 2015).…”
Section: Acknowledging Preconditions and Bases Of Interand Transdiscimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These common components thus comprise the integrative design of the research, the team collaboration of the involved actors, the joint conception of the research problem and the necessity of integrating and synthetising knowledge from various disciplines and sources (Jahn et al 2012; Zscheischler and Rogga 2015). The distinction mainly consists in the professional orientation of the involved actors: in the case of interdisciplinarity, all actors have a professional background in academia, and scientific interests dominate, whereas in the case of transdisciplinarity, stakeholders and actor groups also partake, and a range of diverse outcomes are expected, including those of practical value for real-life questions (cf.…”
Section: Inter-and Transdisciplinary Research Practicementioning
confidence: 99%