2013
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field

Abstract: Sustainability challenges are complex. So are the challenges that business firms encounter in their corresponding quest for corporate sustainability. Given this complexity, there is a need for new approaches to corporate sustainability management research. We discuss transdisciplinarity as such a novel approach in three steps. After showing that specialization is the primary conventional response to increasing complexity, we first briefly compare how inter‐, multi‐ and transdisciplinarity reintegrate decentral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
145
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
145
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the literature, the term CS is used to refer to the triple bottom line and to the long-term profitability of organisations (e.g., Bansal, 2002, Dyllick andHockerts, 2002). This can be understood as the successful market-oriented realisation and integration of ecological, social and economic challenges to an organisation (Schaltegger et al, 2013). According to Dyllick and Hockerts (2002), CS consists of the following elements: 1) a sustainable corporation considers not only economic but also social and environmental aspects, which is consistent with the triple bottom line concept; 2) CS requires a long-term business orientation as a basis for satisfying stakeholders' needs now and in the future; and 3) a sustainable corporation follows the rule of living on the income derived from capital, not on the capital itself.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the literature, the term CS is used to refer to the triple bottom line and to the long-term profitability of organisations (e.g., Bansal, 2002, Dyllick andHockerts, 2002). This can be understood as the successful market-oriented realisation and integration of ecological, social and economic challenges to an organisation (Schaltegger et al, 2013). According to Dyllick and Hockerts (2002), CS consists of the following elements: 1) a sustainable corporation considers not only economic but also social and environmental aspects, which is consistent with the triple bottom line concept; 2) CS requires a long-term business orientation as a basis for satisfying stakeholders' needs now and in the future; and 3) a sustainable corporation follows the rule of living on the income derived from capital, not on the capital itself.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the term CS has emerged as a concept which can be conceived as a prerequisite for achieving superior business performance (Dyllick and Hockerts, 2002;Chang and Kuo, 2008;Linnenluecke and Griffiths, 2013). From this perspective, CS can be defined as "the successful market-oriented realization and integration of ecological, social and economic challenges to a company" (Schaltegger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Corporate Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be defined as "the successful market-oriented realization and integration of ecological, social and economic challenges to a company [20]. The influence of corporate sustainability on organizational performance has been extensively analyzed over the last decades [21][22][23].…”
Section: Sustainable Innovation and Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%