2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdermal Scopolamine Patch with Odansetron for the Control of Nausea after Uterine Artery Embolization Compared with Odansetron Alone: Results of a Randomized Placebo–Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nausea levels overall were low, with mean scores for all patients of 2.63 on Day 1 and 1.35 on Day 2. Transdermal scopolamine patients scored 1.8 ± 2.6 for nausea on Day 1 compared with 3.4 ± 3.5 for placebo patients (P = 0.03), but the difference was not significant on Day 2 [53].…”
Section: Transdermal Scopolamine Combined With Other Agents And/or Comentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nausea levels overall were low, with mean scores for all patients of 2.63 on Day 1 and 1.35 on Day 2. Transdermal scopolamine patients scored 1.8 ± 2.6 for nausea on Day 1 compared with 3.4 ± 3.5 for placebo patients (P = 0.03), but the difference was not significant on Day 2 [53].…”
Section: Transdermal Scopolamine Combined With Other Agents And/or Comentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, the multiple (and possibly interactive) targets of scopolamine actions (both peripheral and central) complicate the direct relationship between effect and blood concentration. Supporting this view: first, the pharmacokinetics of transdermal scopolamine are best modeled by a multi-compartment model rather than a Table 2 Overview of several studies evaluating the efficacy of transdermal scopolamine for postoperative nausea and vomiting or postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PONV/PDNV) prophylaxis [28][29][30]43,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] single-compartment model [41] and, second, there is considerable variability in plasma concentration among individuals who respond to the drug. For instance, in one typical study, the mean plasma concentration of scopolamine in those experiencing an antiemetic effect had a standard error that was nearly half as large as the mean itself (157 ± 77 pg/ mL) [42].…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few limitations of this study included the lack of a control-group without prophylaxis, PONV assessments were performed only for 24 h after surgery and all subjects had an indwelling urinary catheter; thus, the side effect of TDS on urinary retention was not assessed (15, 16). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%