2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdermal iontophoresis of 5-fluorouracil combined with electroporation and laser treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With progressive removal of the stratum corneum, the ionised and neutral forms of phenobarbital permeated through the less-resistant skin barrier at much higher rates. Similar behaviour has been seen for 5-fluorouracil (Fang et al, 2004), with removal of the stratum corneum leading to an increase in passive diffusion from <0.03 mol cm −2 in 6 h to approximately 17 mol cm −2 a difference of more than 550-fold. Fig.…”
Section: Permeation Across Compromised Skinsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…With progressive removal of the stratum corneum, the ionised and neutral forms of phenobarbital permeated through the less-resistant skin barrier at much higher rates. Similar behaviour has been seen for 5-fluorouracil (Fang et al, 2004), with removal of the stratum corneum leading to an increase in passive diffusion from <0.03 mol cm −2 in 6 h to approximately 17 mol cm −2 a difference of more than 550-fold. Fig.…”
Section: Permeation Across Compromised Skinsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, the anodal polarity may also have created transient aqueous pathways. But this would have had no effect on the electrophoretic transport of a negatively charged drug [13,14] . The results indicate that the contribution of electrophoretic movement was not important for (+)-catechin.…”
Section: Transdermal Delivery Of (+)-Catechin By Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the criteria for reliable and reproducible skin-mediated drug delivery, a range of approaches and enhancement techniques, primarily aimed at disrupting the formidable barrier effect of the (epi)dermal layer, have been proposed, and these are typically physical or chemical in origin (Howard & Kenneth, 1996;Benson, 2005;Ritesh & Anil, 2007;Tiwary et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Nikhil et al, 2008;Dhamecha et al, 2009;Pathan & Setty, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Madishetti et al, 2010;Sharma et al, 2011). The physical techniques primarily include iontophoresis, sonophoresis and laser-based treatments, all of which are laborious, require specialized equipment and there are also cases of irreversible skin damage being attributed to such approaches (Meidan et al, 1999;Fang et al, 2004;Brahma & Shyam, 2008;Clara et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%