2007
DOI: 10.1177/000348940711600107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (VitalStim) Curative Therapy for Severe Dysphagia: Myth or Reality?

Abstract: VitalStim therapy seems to help those with mild to moderate dysphagia. However, the patients with the most severe dysphagia in our study did not gain independence from their feeding tubes. The authors conclude that VitalStim therapy clearly has a place in the management of dysphagia, but that the most severely afflicted are unlikely to gain dramatic improvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
4
71
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While some studies 1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] show benefits in the pathophysiology of swallowing in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia submitted to NMES, others [5][6][7] report the absence of physiological and functional changes resulting from these stimuli. It must be said that even the publications that demonstrate positive results present questionable methodological designs in scientific relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some studies 1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] show benefits in the pathophysiology of swallowing in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia submitted to NMES, others [5][6][7] report the absence of physiological and functional changes resulting from these stimuli. It must be said that even the publications that demonstrate positive results present questionable methodological designs in scientific relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature about the therapeutic effectiveness of NMES in dysphagia is still controversial, lying since studies [5][6][7] that does not correlate improvement of biomechanic of swallowing as a result of its use, as well as studies that verified this biomechanic optimization and, consequently of dysphagia 1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the routine barium swallow in which only the esophageal stage of swallowing is studied, using the modified barium swallow all four stages of swallowing are studied with particular emphasis on the oral and pharyngeal stages [9]. It is a fluoroscopic procedure designed to determine whether food or liquid is entering a person's lungs, also known as aspiration.…”
Section: Doi: 107243/2054-1945-5-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrate the beneficial effects of NMES on the biomechanics and the physiology of swallowing and oral intake and rehabilitation of dysphagic individuals by different etiologies was the object of five studies, with respective levels of evidence 2B, 2B, 3A, 4, 2B [29][30][31][32][33] that used heterogeneous samples, involving subjects following stroke, Parkinson's disease, cranial trauma, cerebral atrophy, head and neck tumors, among others. All studies have demonstrated satisfactory results, and in one of them 29 61% of patients had improvement in swallowing, 33% had no more use of the feed tube being 6% (severe dysphagia) improved but still required to continue feeding by the feed tube.…”
Section: Effect Of Electrical Stimulation In Subjects Without Vocal Dmentioning
confidence: 99%