Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp)

Cervera‐Garvi, Pablo; Ortega-Ávila, Ana Belén; Marchena‐Rodriguez, Ana; Gijón-Noguerón, Gabriel

doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1857446

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…The Hebrew IdFAI internal consistency (α=0.91) was similar to the values reported in the Greek and Spanish translations (α=0.88–0.94, [ 26 , 27 ]). The ROC analysis yielded an optimal cut-off score of 13, slightly higher than the recommended score of 11 points [ 3 , 26 ]. Only moderate test-retest reliability was achieved for the Hebrew IdFAI (ICC 2,1 =0.73), which is considerably lower than previously reported scores of 0.85–0.95 [ 26 – 28 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…The ROC analysis yielded an optimal cut-off score of 13, slightly higher than the recommended score of 11 points [ 3 , 26 ]. Only moderate test-retest reliability was achieved for the Hebrew IdFAI (ICC 2,1 =0.73), which is considerably lower than previously reported scores of 0.85–0.95 [ 26 – 28 ]. It is unclear why this instrument resulted in the lowest test-retest reliability scores.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The International Ankle Consortium has recommended several instruments for assessing and diagnosing chronic ankle instability. These include the Ankle Instability Instrument (AII), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and assess the reliability, validity, discriminative power, and classification agreement of the Hebrew online versions of the AII, CAIT, IdFAI, and FAAM. Material/Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires, we recruited 87 participants with self-reported ankle disorders to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaires. To evaluate each questionnaire’s discriminative power, we recruited 75 healthy participants. Reliability was assessed by calculating internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas) and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed by Spearman’s correlation between each instrument and the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) score for physical and mental components, respectively. Results All instruments had acceptable internal consistency (α>0.7) and good test-retest reliability (ICC 2,1 >0.8), except for the IdFAI (ICC 2,1 =0.73). All instruments had moderate convergent validity (ρ>0.4 with SF-12 physical component) except for AII (ρ=0.36). No instrument was correlated with the SF-12 mental component score (good divergent validity, ρ<0.3). All instruments had excellent discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve >0.9). Strong correlations were found between all instruments. Conclusions The Hebrew online versions of the AII, CAIT, IdFAI, and FAAM are valid, consistent, and reliable and may be used in research or clinical settings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As in the original and Turkish versions of the GPS, as in other transcultural adaptations of self-administered questionnaires, women outnumber men. [23][24][25] This imbalance could be due to the fact that although pain is multifactorial in its evolution and development, there is evidence of a direct relationship between age 26 and female gender, 27 with joint and musculoskeletal pain being especially common in women aged 45 -55 years. 28,29 Regarding the psychometric properties of the GPS-Sp, our results corroborate its validity and reliability, with a five-factor construct that accounts for 66.69% of the total variance, unlike the English and Turkish versions, for which only four factors were identified.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As in the original and Turkish versions of the GPS, as in other transcultural adaptations of self‐administered questionnaires, women outnumber men 23–25 . This imbalance could be due to the fact that although pain is multifactorial in its evolution and development, there is evidence of a direct relationship between age 26 and female gender, 27 with joint and musculoskeletal pain being especially common in women aged 45 –55 years 28,29 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Global Pain Scale

Ortega-Ávila

Gijón-Noguerón

Cervera‐Garvi

et al. 2022

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Global Pain Scale (GPS) to produce a Spanish-language version (GPS-Sp) and to determine the psychometric properties of this instrument. The GPS was cross-culturally translated into Spanish following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The initial study population was composed of 384 patients recruited from February to May 2021. All participants were aged at least 18 years and were currently experiencing pain. All gave signed informed consent to take part and completed the Brief Inventory-Sp and GPS-Spain questionnaires. Cronbach's ɑ and test/retest reliability values were calculated and floor/ceiling effects analyzed. Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The 370 patients included in the final analysis presented the following characteristics: 36.2% were male and 63.8% were female; mean age 42.6 (19-88) years; mean body mass index 24.99. Internal consistency was good. The Cronbach's ɑ for GPS-Sp was 0.86 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI; 0.87-0.97). Five main explanatory factors were identified by CFA, which produced the following values: RMSEA = 0.057; CFI = 0.807; GFI = 0.809; NFI = 0.763. No floor/ceiling effect was observed. The GPS-Sp is a valid, reliable and sensitive instrument for assessing pain in a Spanish-speaking population and could facilitate pain relief in this population.biomechanics, clinical outcomes, foot and ankle, low back pain, osteoarthritis | INTRODUCTIONPain is a global health problem 1 that is estimated to affect 20% of all adults, while another 10% are diagnosed with chronic pain each year. 2 Although pain affects all populations, regardless of age, sex, income, race/ethnicity, and geography, it is not equally distributed around the world. Moreover, it may be experienced acutely, chronically (defined as lasting for longer than 3 months) or intermittently, or even as a combination of all three. 3 The background and causes of pain are complex questions, which

show abstract

Validity and reliability of the French translation of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI)

Beaudart

Demoulin

Mehmeti

et al. 2022

Foot and Ankle Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp)

Cited by 7 publications

References 27 publications

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Global Pain Scale

Validity and reliability of the French translation of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About