2004
DOI: 10.1128/jb.186.24.8385-8400.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic and Proteomic Characterization of the Fur Modulon in the Metal-Reducing Bacterium Shewanella oneidensis

Abstract: The availability of the complete genome sequence for Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 has permitted a comprehensive characterization of the ferric uptake regulator (Fur) modulon in this dissimilatory metal-reducing bacterium. We have employed targeted gene mutagenesis, DNA microarrays, proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and computational motif discovery tools to define the S. oneidensis Fur regulon. Using this integrated approach, we identified nine probable operons (containing 24 gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
150
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
11
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transposon insertion sites were mapped as previously described (Bouhenni et al, 2005). For in-frame deletion mutants, the two-step protocol of selection (single cross-over, antibiotic resistance) and counter-selection (double crossover, sucrose sensitivity) was conducted using the suicide vector pDS3.0 (R6K replicon, sacB, Gm R )-based constructs with a fusion of upstream and downstream sequences of the target gene as previously described (Wan et al, 2004). For genetic complementation analyses, the target genes were PCR amplified and cloned into the pBBR1-MCS5 or pHERD30 vector (Qiu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Transposon Mutagenesis In-frame Deletion and Genetic Complementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transposon insertion sites were mapped as previously described (Bouhenni et al, 2005). For in-frame deletion mutants, the two-step protocol of selection (single cross-over, antibiotic resistance) and counter-selection (double crossover, sucrose sensitivity) was conducted using the suicide vector pDS3.0 (R6K replicon, sacB, Gm R )-based constructs with a fusion of upstream and downstream sequences of the target gene as previously described (Wan et al, 2004). For genetic complementation analyses, the target genes were PCR amplified and cloned into the pBBR1-MCS5 or pHERD30 vector (Qiu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Transposon Mutagenesis In-frame Deletion and Genetic Complementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate reduction was assayed in the modified M1 medium supplemented with 50 mM sodium lactate as the electron donor and carbon source and sodium nitrate as the electron acceptors (Wan et al, 2004). The bacterial cultures were incubated under microoxic conditions (without shaking to limit aeration).…”
Section: Nitrate Reduction Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BG167, a pilD mutant of S. oneidensis MR-1, was generated using the Mini-himar RB-1 transposon [27]. Chromosomal deletions of gspG, type IV pilus biogenesis, Msh pilus biogenesis, and flagellin genes were generated using the modified suicide plasmid pER2, a derivative of pDS3 [28] using described protocols [29]. DNA fragments for generation of deletions or complementation of mutants were amplified by PCR using Phusion polymerase (Clontech) and primers listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Mutagenesis Complementation and Protein Analysis Of S Oneimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approximately 2.4-kbp fragment was deleted from SO3389 (2,639 bp) with PCR-based crossover amplification as described previously (1,17,56). The primer pairs used to generate two DNA fragments with 3Ј-staggered ends were as follows: No-5Ј-CGCGAGCTCGTTCGGACCTTCG ATAAATC-3Ј and Ni-5Ј-TGTTTAAACTTAGTGGATGGGGCCCAATCTGT TAACTGCTT-3Ј and Co-5Ј-CGCGAGCTCGCACCTTGACGCAAATGAT C-3Ј and Ci-5Ј-CCCATCCACTAAGTTTAAACAGCGGATGTTGAGGCCTT TTT-3Ј (noncomplementary tag sequences are underlined), and the outside primers were used to amplify a fusion molecule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crossover PCR product was purified and digested by SacI, cloned into treated suicide vector pDS3.0, and electroporated into E. coli S17-1/ pir . The suicide plasmid construct was moved into MR-1 as previously described (56), and the mutated SO3389 gene was verified by PCR (5Ј-GAGTGGCATTCAGCACTAGA-3Ј and 5Ј-CATACGGT CGGCTTCATCAA-3Ј) and sequence determination. The resulting mutant did not possess any of the predicted domains after completion of the in-frame deletion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%