2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptomic analysis of clonal growth rate variation during CHO cell line development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to address this issue, a number of proteomic, transcriptomic and metabolic based studies have now been undertaken and the subsequent data used to develop models to predict the phenotype of a given cell line (e.g. Clarke et al, 2011;Clarke et al, 2012;Doolan et al, 2013;Jacob et al, 2010;Mead et al, 2009;Mead et al, 2012;Meleady et al, 2011;Sanchez et al, 2014;Selvarasu et al, 2012), however these models are usually developed from cell line data at the end of the cell line development process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to address this issue, a number of proteomic, transcriptomic and metabolic based studies have now been undertaken and the subsequent data used to develop models to predict the phenotype of a given cell line (e.g. Clarke et al, 2011;Clarke et al, 2012;Doolan et al, 2013;Jacob et al, 2010;Mead et al, 2009;Mead et al, 2012;Meleady et al, 2011;Sanchez et al, 2014;Selvarasu et al, 2012), however these models are usually developed from cell line data at the end of the cell line development process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address this issue, a number of proteomic, transcriptomic and metabolic based studies have now been undertaken and the subsequent data used to develop models to predict the phenotype of a given cell line (e.g. Clarke et al, 2011;Clarke et al, 2012;Doolan et al, 2013;Jacob et al, 2010;Mead et al, 2009;Mead et al, 2012;Meleady et al, 2011;Sanchez et al, 2014;Selvarasu et al, 2012), however these models are usually developed from cell line data at the end of the cell line development process.The goal of this work was to develop a screening system that would allow the selection of highly productive cell lines for monoclonal antibody (mAb) production early in the cell line development process that would use substantially less resource to achieve the same or better success rate as current methods. The vision was to be able to select a small number of cell lines based upon the analysis of data generated in multi-well plates, and take these straight to a lab-scale bioreactorevaluation stage (10 L) with a high probability that the selected cell lines were highly productive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jing and colleagues observed that angiotensinogen (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 8) was upregulated 2.15 fold in dexamethasone treated CHO cultures, and they associated the upregulation to the anti-apoptotic effects of dexamethasone (Jing et al, 2012). Most recently, Doolan et al concluded that Serpinf1 negatively correlated to growth rate in their transcriptomic studies on biomarker discovery for higher growth in CHO cells (Doolan et al, 2013). Although these Serpins may all have different substrates of inhibition and functions in their native tissue and cell types, they may play similar roles as Serpinb1 in CHO cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, two sets of values for μ g and q p were extracted from each reference, the first corresponding to a low productivity to growth rate ratio (Dool-L24, Chus-L25, and Kant-L26), and the second corresponding to a high productivity to growth ratio (Dool-H24, Chus-H25, and Kant-H26) (Table 1). All but the μ g and q p values obtained from Kant-H correspond to industrial CHO cell lines continuously expressing a recombinant mAb while growing exponentially.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the assumed values for M cell  = 271 pg / cell 34 and Z prot  = 74.2%35 with the μ g values obtained from literature242526, cellular protein productivity can be estimated (Eq. 22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%