2024
DOI: 10.3390/foods13020336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptome Reveals Regulation of Quorum Sensing of Hafnia alvei H4 on the Coculture System of Hafnia alvei H4 and Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC13525

Yanan Wang,
Xue Li,
Gongliang Zhang
et al.

Abstract: In the food industry, foodborne spoilage bacteria often live in mixed species and attach to each other, leading to changes in spoilage characteristics. Quorum sensing (QS) has been reported to be a regulating mechanism for food spoiling by certain kinds of bacteria. Here, the contents of biofilm, extracellular polysaccharides, and biogenic amines in the coculture system of Hafnia alvei H4 and Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC13525 were significantly reduced when the QS element of H. alvei H4 was deleted, confirming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 6 A, after 72 h of culture, the maximum concentration of cadaverine produced by wild strains was 252.7 mg/L, while the cadaverine concentrations of Δ luxI , Δ luxR and Δ luxIR were 194.5 mg/L, 175.1 mg/L and 154.2 mg/L, respectively, indicating that the luxI and luxR genes have a potential upregulation on the production of cadaverine. According to Wang’s work [ 26 ], similar results were obtained, where the amounts of putrescine and cadaverine of Δ luxI strains were always lower ( p < 0.05) compared with wild-type H. alvei H4. The cadaverine concentrations of different phenotypic strains at 0–96 h were used as the basis neuron for SOM analysis in Figure 6 B.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 6 A, after 72 h of culture, the maximum concentration of cadaverine produced by wild strains was 252.7 mg/L, while the cadaverine concentrations of Δ luxI , Δ luxR and Δ luxIR were 194.5 mg/L, 175.1 mg/L and 154.2 mg/L, respectively, indicating that the luxI and luxR genes have a potential upregulation on the production of cadaverine. According to Wang’s work [ 26 ], similar results were obtained, where the amounts of putrescine and cadaverine of Δ luxI strains were always lower ( p < 0.05) compared with wild-type H. alvei H4. The cadaverine concentrations of different phenotypic strains at 0–96 h were used as the basis neuron for SOM analysis in Figure 6 B.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As shown in Figure 6A, after 72 h of culture, the maximum concentration of cadaverine produced by wild strains was 252.7 mg/L, while the cadaverine concentrations of ΔluxI, ΔluxR and ΔluxIR were 194.5 mg/L, 175.1 mg/L and 154.2 mg/L, respectively, indicating that the luxI and luxR genes have a potential upregulation on the production of cadaverine. According to Wang's work [26], similar results were obtained, where the amounts of putrescine and cadaverine of ΔluxI strains were always lower (p < Likewise, the influence of the luxI and luxR genes on cadaverine production was specifically analyzed. As shown in Figure 6A, after 72 h of culture, the maximum concentration of cadaverine produced by wild strains was 252.7 mg/L, while the cadaverine concentrations of ∆luxI, ∆luxR and ∆luxIR were 194.5 mg/L, 175.1 mg/L and 154.2 mg/L, respectively, indicating that the luxI and luxR genes have a potential upregulation on the production of cadaverine.…”
Section: Putrescine and Cadaverine Productionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation