2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10126-010-9283-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptome Profiling of Embryonic Development Rate in Rainbow Trout Advanced Backcross Introgression Lines

Abstract: In rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and other fishes, embryonic development rate is an ecologically and evolutionarily important trait that is closely associated with survival and physiological performance later in life. To identify genes differentially regulated in fast and slow-developing embryos of rainbow trout, we examined gene expression across developmental time points in rainbow trout embryos possessing alleles linked to a major quantitative trait loci (QTL) for fast versus slow embryonic developmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These individual differences could not be due to environmental variation because we sampled the animals from one natural population. Rather, this inter-individual variation could be due to the age of the individuals sampled, as gene expression profiles can change rapidly at different stages of development (e.g., Xu et al, 2011). The three individuals we sampled were all young of the year, but they differed by up to 20 mm in the SVL and thus may have been at slightly different stages of development.…”
Section: Transcript Expression Levelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These individual differences could not be due to environmental variation because we sampled the animals from one natural population. Rather, this inter-individual variation could be due to the age of the individuals sampled, as gene expression profiles can change rapidly at different stages of development (e.g., Xu et al, 2011). The three individuals we sampled were all young of the year, but they differed by up to 20 mm in the SVL and thus may have been at slightly different stages of development.…”
Section: Transcript Expression Levelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, genes involved in the cell cycle and nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism functional categories were found to be differentially expressed between two ecotypes of lake whitefish at the embryonic stage, suggesting their importance in transcription regulation and development of the embryos (Nolte et al, 2009). In addition, genes involved in these two functional categories were also found to be overexpressed in fast developing rainbow trout individuals (Xu et al, 2010). Thus, the higher length of L~R# relative to R~L# hybrids at the yolk sac resorption stage, and faster development rate from hatching to yolk Parental effects on transcriptomic profiles B Bougas et al sac resorption, could be associated with the great number of genes that were differentially expressed at this stage.…”
Section: Parental Influence Among Cross-typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Gibson et al (2004) showed that 2% of the 12 559 analyzed genes in F1 heterozygotes presented parental effects (that is, a resemblance to either paternal or maternal expression). In fishes, previous studies mostly emphasized differences in gene expression during embryogenesis to detect maternal-effect genes across developmental transitions or to detect differences in development rate in embryos (Mathavan et al, 2005;Bai et al, 2007;Nolte et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2010;Renaut et al, 2011). To our knowledge, however, no study has yet systematically focused on investigating the dynamics of parental effects on the transcriptome across different development stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microarrays and, more recently, RNA-seq by means of NGS technologies have been used to compare the transcriptomes of phenotypically distinct individuals, namely in salmonid fishes St-Cyr et al, 2008;Goetz et al, 2010;Jeukens et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2010). Typically, many transcriptomic differences involved genes with functions related to energy production, muscular activity, immunity and cell cycle regulation processes.…”
Section: Gene Expression Among Crossesmentioning
confidence: 99%