2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptome profile of lung dendritic cells after in vitro porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection

Abstract: The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is an infectious disease that leads to high financial and production losses in the global swine industry. The pathogenesis of this disease is dependent on a multitude of factors, and its control remains problematic. The immune system generally defends against infectious diseases, especially dendritic cells (DCs), which play a crucial role in the activation of the immune response after viral infections. However, the understanding of the immune response an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One running hypothesis is that the differences in pathogenicity of the PRRSV strains might be due to their differential abilities to infect or activate DCs, impacting the inflammatory response as well as the mounting of a protective adaptive immune response. Two studies tentatively tackled the lung DCs infection in vivo by PRRSV-1 and 2 respectively ( 17 , 18 ). However, none of them clearly defined nor distinguished DCs and macrophages, leading to results that cannot be clearly interpreted in terms of DCs/PRRSV interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One running hypothesis is that the differences in pathogenicity of the PRRSV strains might be due to their differential abilities to infect or activate DCs, impacting the inflammatory response as well as the mounting of a protective adaptive immune response. Two studies tentatively tackled the lung DCs infection in vivo by PRRSV-1 and 2 respectively ( 17 , 18 ). However, none of them clearly defined nor distinguished DCs and macrophages, leading to results that cannot be clearly interpreted in terms of DCs/PRRSV interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent data regarding PRRSV infection of other DC subsets are noticeable when primary lung and tracheal DC are considered. In fact, a recent publication [66] using primary lung DC, which was generated with enzymatic treatment and with an unclear DC phenotype (Table 1), showed that PRRSV-1 Lelystad (LV) virus was able to infect lung DC more efficiently in Duroc than in the Pietrain breed. On the other side, starting with Loving et al in 2007 and finishing with recent results from both Resendiz et al and Bordet et al in 2018, it has been demonstrated that primary lung and tracheal DC are unable to support PRRSV-1 and 2 replication [48,60,67].…”
Section: Innate Cellular Immune Responses Triggered By Prrsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They identified key clusters and pathways as well as specific genes (SEC61β, SLA7) that play important roles in animal health. Finally, the up regulation of IL1β in Duroc could explain the better immune response of Duroc when compared to Pietrain [66].…”
Section: Innate Cellular Immune Responses Triggered By Prrsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microarray data revealed critical differentially expressed genes in lung tissue between Dapulian (DPL) pigs and Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire (DLY) pigs after PRRSV infection resulting in different clinical outcomes [14]. Transcriptome analysis of lung dendritic cells (DCs) derived from Pietrain and Duroc revealed Duroc reacted more distinctly and strongly than Pietrain during various periods of PRRSV infection [15]. e transcriptome study of PAMs in Tongcheng (TC) pigs and Large White (LW) pigs showed that two breeds had different immune responses to PRRSV infection [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%