Transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during production of D-xylonate

Abstract

BackgroundProduction of D-xylonate by the yeast S. cerevisiae provides an example of bioprocess development for sustainable production of value-added chemicals from cheap raw materials or side streams. Production of D-xylonate may lead to considerable intracellular accumulation of D-xylonate and to loss of viability during the production process. In order to understand the physiological responses associated with D-xylonate production, we performed transcriptome analyses during D-xylonate production by a robust recombinant strain of S. cerevisiae which produces up to 50 g/L D-xylonate.ResultsComparison of the transcriptomes of the D-xylonate producing and the control strain showed considerably higher expression of the genes controlled by the cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway and of some genes previously identified as up-regulated in response to other organic acids in the D-xylonate producing strain. Increased phosphorylation of Slt2 kinase in the D-xylonate producing strain also indicated that D-xylonate production caused stress to the cell wall. Surprisingly, genes encoding proteins involved in translation, ribosome structure and RNA metabolism, processes which are commonly down-regulated under conditions causing cellular stress, were up-regulated during D-xylonate production, compared to the control. The overall transcriptional responses were, therefore, very dissimilar to those previously reported as being associated with stress, including stress induced by organic acid treatment or production. Quantitative PCR analyses of selected genes supported the observations made in the transcriptomic analysis. In addition, consumption of ethanol was slower and the level of trehalose was lower in the D-xylonate producing strain, compared to the control.ConclusionsThe production of organic acids has a major impact on the physiology of yeast cells, but the transcriptional responses to presence or production of different acids differs considerably, being much more diverse than responses to other stresses. D-Xylonate production apparently imposed considerable stress on the cell wall. Transcriptional data also indicated that activation of the PKA pathway occurred during D-xylonate production, leaving cells unable to adapt normally to stationary phase. This, together with intracellular acidification, probably contributes to cell death.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-763) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Synthetic Transcription Amplifier System for Orthogonal Control of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

“…At the same time the expression of GFP was retained under control of the ENO1 cp ( Fig 3A ). Two weak promoters were tested, the core promoters of the DAN1 gene, previously shown to be a weakly expressed gene [ 17 ], and the core promoter of the YLR156W gene, previously shown to confer negligible expression [ 34 ]. The DAN1 and YLR156W core promoters had a significant influence on the expression output, the DAN1 cp providing moderate expression activation and the YLR156W cp providing negligible expression ( Fig 3D and 3E ).…”

L‐lactate production in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a multistage multiobjective automated design framework

“…By the approach of Redirector analysis, this second KO gene set is correlated with the upregulation of four genes CDC19, CTP1, GLO1, and GLO2 . CDC19 is the gene encoding the pyruvate kinase, which plays not only a role in regulating the shift from fermentative (upregulation) to oxidative (downregulation) metabolism in yeast, but it is also an important provider of ATP (Mojzita et al, 2014; Szatkowska et al, 2019). The upregulation of the citrate transport protein coded by CTP1 gene needs to increase the NADPH availability.…”

Synthetic Toolkit for Complex Genetic Circuit Engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

“…are traditionally used for heterologous gene expression in S. cerevisiae , and they are usually referred to as constitutive promoters with stable expression outputs. In fact, the activity of these promoters is highly dependent on the conditions, conferring the highest activity in the presence of glucose (fermentative growth) and being strongly down-regulated during respiratory and stationary growth phases. ,, This could be a disadvantage in many applications where robust and stable expression is desirable. The expression system developed here is designed to be constitutive, as it does not contain any regulatory sequences (such as native upstream elements in the promoters), which are often subject to conditional control.…”