Transcriptome analysis of cattle muscle identifies potential markers for skeletal muscle growth rate and major cell types

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify markers for muscle growth rate and the different cellular contributors to cattle muscle and to link the muscle growth rate markers to specific cell types.ResultsThe expression of two groups of genes in the longissimus muscle (LM) of 48 Brahman steers of similar age, significantly enriched for “cell cycle” and “ECM (extracellular matrix) organization” Gene Ontology (GO) terms was correlated with average daily gain/kg liveweight (ADG/kg) of the animals. However, expression of the same genes was only partly related to growth rate across a time course of postnatal LM development in two cattle genotypes, Piedmontese x Hereford (high muscling) and Wagyu x Hereford (high marbling). The deposition of intramuscular fat (IMF) altered the relationship between the expression of these genes and growth rate. K-means clustering across the development time course with a large set of genes (5,596) with similar expression profiles to the ECM genes was undertaken. The locations in the clusters of published markers of different cell types in muscle were identified and used to link clusters of genes to the cell type most likely to be expressing them. Overall correspondence between published cell type expression of markers and predicted major cell types of expression in cattle LM was high. However, some exceptions were identified: expression of SOX8 previously attributed to muscle satellite cells was correlated with angiogenesis. Analysis of the clusters and cell types suggested that the “cell cycle” and “ECM” signals were from the fibro/adipogenic lineage. Significant contributions to these signals from the muscle satellite cells, angiogenic cells and adipocytes themselves were not as strongly supported. Based on the clusters and cell type markers, sets of five genes predicted to be representative of fibro/adipogenic precursors (FAPs) and endothelial cells, and/or ECM remodelling and angiogenesis were identified.ConclusionsGene sets and gene markers for the analysis of many of the major processes/cell populations contributing to muscle composition and growth have been proposed, enabling a consistent interpretation of gene expression datasets from cattle LM. The same gene sets are likely to be applicable in other cattle muscles and in other species.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1403-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Powerful detection of polygenic selection and evidence of environmental adaptation in US beef cattle

“…Candidate genes identified by GPSM in Simmental point towards selection on pathways involved in digestion and metabolic functions (Arachidonic acid metabolism, Gastric acid secretion, Salivary secretion, Carbohydrate digestion and absorption) that are likely due to increases in production efficiency [58][59][60] . In each breed, we identify numerous biological processes involved in cell cycle control under selection, a group of processes directly involved in muscle growth rate in cattle 61 . Additionally, in Red Angus and Gelbvieh we identify multiple cancer pathways under selection.…”

Genome wide association study on beef production traits in Marchigiana cattle breed

“…Another promising candidate gene for ADG was TGFB2. This gene regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, and it was already reported as a locus involved in extracellular matrix organization of muscle development (Guo et al 2015). Moreover, polymorphisms at TGFB2 were associated with growth traits in chicken (Darzi Niarami et al 2014).…”

Tissue Engineering for Clean Meat Production

“…As for the cell source, the following sections will emphasize the use of bovine cells, as developing clean beef could be considered as a pragmatic approach for the initial stages of clean meat production, since (1) the overwhelming majority of tissue engineering research is done in mammalian cells, (2) beef is considered an expensive meat, (3) beef has a larger ecological impact compared to other conventional meats (Tuomisto and de Mattos, 2011), and (4) biopsies from larger animals are less invasive. Biomarkers of major cell types found in bovine muscle have been previously summarized (Du et al, 2015;Guo et al, 2015). Additional cell types found in the muscle, their roles and biomarkers were summarized by Tedesco et al (2017).…”