2000
DOI: 10.1042/0300-5127:0280390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional repression by nuclear receptors: mechanisms and role in disease

Abstract: Co-repressor proteins mediate transcriptional repression by nuclear receptors in the absence of ligand. The identification of a co-repressor-receptor interaction motif, and the finding that co-repressors and co-activators compete for the same site on the receptor, suggests a simple mechanism for the switch from repression to activation upon ligand binding. Defects in this mechanism result in dominant-negative receptors that repress transcription. Such receptors have been implicated in several clinically import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown previously that dominant-negative inhibition by PPARγ mutants (P467L, V290M), is mediated by repression of target genes by DNA-bound mutant receptors, analogous to mechanisms of other mutant nuclear receptors (e.g., the v-erbA oncogene, TRβ mutants in Resistance to Thyroid Hormone, PZLF-RARα fusion proteins in promyelocytic leukaemia) (Love et al., 2000). In contrast, the missense DBD and LBD truncation mutants identified here are unable to bind DNA, yet can inhibit WT PPARγ action, suggesting a different mechanism of transcriptional interference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown previously that dominant-negative inhibition by PPARγ mutants (P467L, V290M), is mediated by repression of target genes by DNA-bound mutant receptors, analogous to mechanisms of other mutant nuclear receptors (e.g., the v-erbA oncogene, TRβ mutants in Resistance to Thyroid Hormone, PZLF-RARα fusion proteins in promyelocytic leukaemia) (Love et al., 2000). In contrast, the missense DBD and LBD truncation mutants identified here are unable to bind DNA, yet can inhibit WT PPARγ action, suggesting a different mechanism of transcriptional interference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Upon ligand (L) activation, the CoRep dissociates from the heterodimer, that now recruits co-activators (CoAct) and increases transcription of target genes, such as ILK and PDK1 [24]. (c) The CoRep that is released from the heterodimer can also transrepress non-PPRE-harbouring genes [46,47]. De novo protein synthesis is not required for these modes of action.…”
Section: Wound Re-epithelializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other common dominant negative mutations include truncated molecules that maintain ligand-or target-binding functions but lack other functional domains (23)(24)(25)(26). Dominant negative mutations work by inhibiting the function of the wild-type allele, which often occurs by the mutated allele "poisoning" a molecular complex or titrating key components required for function.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%