2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional regulatory divergence underpinning species-specific learned vocalization in songbirds

Abstract: Learning of most motor skills is constrained in a species-specific manner. However, the proximate mechanisms underlying species-specific learned behaviors remain poorly understood. Songbirds acquire species-specific songs through learning, which is hypothesized to depend on species-specific patterns of gene expression in functionally specialized brain regions for vocal learning and production, called song nuclei. Here, we leveraged two closely related songbird species, zebra finch, owl finch, and their intersp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the identity of differentially expressed genes of androgen and oestrogen‐responsive sites in a motor nucleus of the song control system in brains of canaries ( Serinus canaria ) and zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) seems to be species‐specific: they express different types of genes to regulate a similar motor output, singing behavior. [ 43 ] Even among zebra finch relatives, the estrildid finches, the type of genes expressed in the song control nuclei during singing differs substantially, [ 44 ] suggesting strong diversification even among close relatives within the songbird clade.…”
Section: A Common Misunderstanding—adaptations Versus Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the identity of differentially expressed genes of androgen and oestrogen‐responsive sites in a motor nucleus of the song control system in brains of canaries ( Serinus canaria ) and zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) seems to be species‐specific: they express different types of genes to regulate a similar motor output, singing behavior. [ 43 ] Even among zebra finch relatives, the estrildid finches, the type of genes expressed in the song control nuclei during singing differs substantially, [ 44 ] suggesting strong diversification even among close relatives within the songbird clade.…”
Section: A Common Misunderstanding—adaptations Versus Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene fosb is expected to show an early peak like c-fos (Nestler, 2015) but instead showed only high upregulation at 4 h in B. orientalis. Homer1, which is integral to the regulation of synaptic changes induced by LTP (Chowdhury and Hell, 2018), was not differentially expressed at any time-point after conditioning in B. orientalis, and neither was bdnf, a gene coding for an important neurotrophic factor associated with neurogenesis and longterm memory in mammals and song learning in birds (Lu et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2019). Therefore, despite observing important similarities in IEG expression between B. orientalis and other vertebrates, there were notable differences in that some IEGs showed different temporal patterns of expression while others were not engaged by the learning task used in the present study.…”
Section: Immediate Early Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By tapping into the existing genetic and behavioral diversity of wild and captive lineages in zebra finches (e.g. Forstmeier et al, 2007 ; Knief et al, 2015 ) to perform comparative avian genomic analyses ( Jarvis et al, 2014 ; Feng et al, 2020 ), interspecific hybridization studies ( Woolley and Sakata, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2019 ), and direct genetic manipulations ( Liu et al, 2015 ; London, 2020 ), the zebra finch shall continue to serve as a focal subject of integrative research into human language-like vocal culture ( Hyland Bruno et al, 2021 ), auditory learning ( Theunissen et al, 2004 ), acoustically-mediated social bonding ( Tokarev et al, 2017 ), and genetic ( Balakrishnan et al, 2010 ) and behavioral (e.g. song) variability ( Lansverk et al, 2019 ; see Box 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%