Substitutions within the interdomain linkers of the AraC/XylS family proteins RhaS and RhaR were tested to determine whether side chain identity or linker structure was required for function. Neither was found crucial, suggesting that the linkers do not play a direct role in activation, but rather simply connect the two domains.In the presence of the sugar L-rhamnose, RhaS and RhaR activate transcription of Escherichia coli genes, whose products are required for the uptake and catabolism of L-rhamnose (6,7,29,30). RhaS and RhaR comprise a regulatory cascade in which L-rhamnose stimulates RhaR to activate transcription of rhaSR (29) and then RhaS activates transcription of the Lrhamnose catabolic operon rhaBAD (7) and the L-rhamnose transport gene rhaT (30). Both RhaS and RhaR are members of the large AraC/XylS family of transcription regulatory proteins, which share sequence similarity in a 100-amino-acid DNA-binding domain (5,10,11,21). AraC/XylS family proteins regulate the expression of genes whose functions include carbon metabolism (3,12,25,28), stress responses (4, 15-18, 22, 32), and pathogenesis (9,14,23,24).RhaS and RhaR each consist of two independently functional domains: an N-terminal domain required for dimerization and response to L-rhamnose (A. Kolin, J. R. Wickstrum, and S. M. Egan, unpublished results) and a C-terminal domain involved in DNA binding and transcription activation (1, 2, 6, 31; J. R. Wickstrum and S. M. Egan, unpublished results). Based on alignment with the AraC dimerization domain and its structure (26) and the MarA protein and its structure (22), we can predict the approximate boundaries of the RhaS and RhaR domains. Such analysis, combined with knowledge of AraC (8), leads to the prediction that there is a flexible linker that connects the two domains of RhaS and RhaR. This linker spans approximately residues 166 to 172 in RhaS and 198 to 207 in RhaR (Fig. 1). Genetic and biochemical studies have shown that many different single and multiple substitutions could be made within the AraC linker without impacting activation (8), suggesting that the AraC arabinose response does not depend on the identity of its linker residues. However, our finding that the ligand responses of RhaS and RhaR differ from that of AraC (A. Kolin and S. M. Egan, unpublished results) left open the possibility that the linker might participate in transmission of the L-rhamnose signal.In this study, we used a genetic approach to analyze the linker regions of RhaS and RhaR. Our previous results indicate that L-rhamnose binds to the N-terminal domains of RhaS and RhaR, while transcription activation involves their C-terminal domains (2, 31; Kolin and Egan, unpublished). Therefore, we sought to determine whether the linker regions of RhaS and/or RhaR were involved in transmitting the L-rhamnose status from the N-to the C-terminal domain or whether, similar to AraC, the linker was required only to flexibly connect the two domains.Single alanine substitutions in the linker region of RhaS and RhaR have, at most,...