2010
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional Profiling by Deep Sequencing Identifies Differences in mRNA Transcript Abundance in In Vivo-Derived Versus In Vitro-Cultured Porcine Blastocyst Stage Embryos1

Abstract: In vitro embryo culture systems promote development at rates lower than in vivo systems. The goal of this project was to discover transcripts that may be responsible for a decrease of embryo competency in blastocyst-stage embryos cultured in vitro. Gilts were artificially inseminated on the first day of estrus, and on Day 2, one oviduct and the tip of a uterine horn were flushed and the recovered embryos were cultured in porcine zygote medium 3 for 4 days. On Day 6, the gilts were euthanized and the contralate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
125
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that in vitro culture significantly alters embryonic gene expression to a lesser extent than previously proposed (Bauer et al, 2010), and a better modulation of the blastocyst transcriptome was achieved by mimicking physiological conditions of fertilization and early embryo development by the addition of reproductive fluids (Natur-IVF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data suggest that in vitro culture significantly alters embryonic gene expression to a lesser extent than previously proposed (Bauer et al, 2010), and a better modulation of the blastocyst transcriptome was achieved by mimicking physiological conditions of fertilization and early embryo development by the addition of reproductive fluids (Natur-IVF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In vitro culture systems significantly alter embryonic gene expression as previously observed in pooled pig blastocysts (Bauer et al, 2010). Here, the transcriptomes from three individual day 7.5 blastocysts produced by C-IVF or Natur-IVF were compared with their in vivo counterparts (Figure 3A–B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, the parameters dictating in vitro developmental competence are frequently in good accordance with TE cell quantity in IVP blastocysts in domestic animals [64, 65]. Moreover, recent reports have shown that the number and proportion of TE cells, unlike ICM, are markedly reduced in IVP porcine blastocysts compared to in vivo blastocysts [66, 67]. Consistent with these demonstrations, the current study showed that modulation of ROS led to changes in the number of TE cells, but not ICM (Figs 2–4, 6 and 7; S3 Fig; S6, S9, S11, S14, S18, and S20 Tables).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression patterns of OCT4, IFN , and CDX2 during early embryonic development allow assessment of the quality of blastocysts produced (Bauer et al, 2010;Ross et al, 2007). In ruminant, the function of IFN is the recognition of pregnancy (Bazer et al, 2008) and IFN gene expression is higher in hatched blastocysts than in expanded and early embryos (Rekik et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%