2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional profiles of unirradiated or UV-irradiated human cells expressing either the cancer-prone XPB/CS allele or the noncancer-prone XPB/TTD allele

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least two scenarios might explain these puzzling overlaps: (i) damage-regulated genes might be coincidentally regulated by other stress-response pathways in CSB-null cells, or (ii) CSB-null cells might attempt to generate a proper transcriptional response to DNA damage but fail. Previous studies of CSB and XPB͞CS cells found that their transcriptional response to DNA damage was deficient (17) or delayed (21), consistent with our evidence for a chromatin remodeling defect. Moreover, the sole strong correlation between CSB-regulated genes and the DNA damage response, a striking overlap between CSB and the anticancer drug Ecteinascidin 743 (Et-743; see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…At least two scenarios might explain these puzzling overlaps: (i) damage-regulated genes might be coincidentally regulated by other stress-response pathways in CSB-null cells, or (ii) CSB-null cells might attempt to generate a proper transcriptional response to DNA damage but fail. Previous studies of CSB and XPB͞CS cells found that their transcriptional response to DNA damage was deficient (17) or delayed (21), consistent with our evidence for a chromatin remodeling defect. Moreover, the sole strong correlation between CSB-regulated genes and the DNA damage response, a striking overlap between CSB and the anticancer drug Ecteinascidin 743 (Et-743; see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Many genes are known to be up-or down-regulated following exposure to DNA damaging agents and there are several reports on expression profile changes following UV-irradiation of human cells [33,[37][38][39][40]. Likewise we observed many genes clearly up-or down-regulated following UV-C-irradiation of human fibroblasts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The first approach entailed comparing the transcriptional profiles of cells in which the phenotype has been corrected by introduction of the wild-type XPD gene. A similar approach was used by Costa et al with XP-B cells [33]. They used a cell line from a patient with the combined features of XP and CS as recipient for XPB cDNA containing either the same mutation as found in the recipient cell or a mutation found in a TTD patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both UV and ionizing radiation increase the transcription of hundreds of genes, including genes directly involved in NER such as XPC, DDB2, PCNA, and Gadd45A (Rieger and Chu 2004;Boerma et al 2005;da Costa et al 2005). However, it has also been reported that cellular protein synthesis is markedly inhibited after UV irradiation (Deng et al 2002;Wu et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%