2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-05785-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional patterns of sexual dimorphism and in host developmental programs in the model parasitic nematode Heligmosomoides bakeri

Stephen M. J. Pollo,
Aralia Leon-Coria,
Hongrui Liu
et al.

Abstract: Background Heligmosomoides bakeri (often mistaken for Heligmosomoides polygyrus) is a promising model for parasitic nematodes with the key advantage of being amenable to study and manipulation within a controlled laboratory environment. While draft genome sequences are available for this worm, which allow for comparative genomic analyses between nematodes, there is a notable lack of information on its gene expression. Methods We generated biologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While no obvious batch effects are apparent here from the use of liberase vs pronase during cell dissociation, or between libraries of the same worm sex, a pronounced batch effect is seen between the male and female worm samples (Figure1D). In our previous analysis of bulk RNA-seq of whole worms (Pollo et al, 2023), the male and female worms at 10 days post-infection (the same time point as used here) were found to statistically significantly differently express 70% of their transcripts. Part of that is due to the different gametes each sex produces and differences in gene expression related to reproduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While no obvious batch effects are apparent here from the use of liberase vs pronase during cell dissociation, or between libraries of the same worm sex, a pronounced batch effect is seen between the male and female worm samples (Figure1D). In our previous analysis of bulk RNA-seq of whole worms (Pollo et al, 2023), the male and female worms at 10 days post-infection (the same time point as used here) were found to statistically significantly differently express 70% of their transcripts. Part of that is due to the different gametes each sex produces and differences in gene expression related to reproduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The Ascaris suum ortholog of this gene was found to be highly expressed in bulk RNA-seq analysis of dissected intestine (Rosa, Jasmer & Mitreva, 2014). Of note, whole worm expression of this transcript in H. bakeri puts it among the top 51% of transcripts in worms of the same age as used here (Pollo et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Protein coding genes (gene models) in the generated assemblies were predicted using Braker 3 (Stanke et al, 2006, 2008; Hoff et al, 2016, 2019; Brůna et al, 2021) installed using the Singularity container (available at https://hub.docker.com/r/teambraker/braker3). For H. contortus and H. bakeri , we used short-read RNA-seq data from the Sequence Read Archive (Leinonen, Sugawara & Shumway, 2011) as external evidence for the gene prediction (BioProjects: PRJEB506 (Laing et al, 2013) and PRJNA750155 (Pollo et al, 2023) respectively). The RNA-seq data was first aligned using the STAR v.2.7.10a aligner (Dobin et al, 2013) and the generated alignments, in bam-format, used to produce a training set for AUGUSTUS, using GeneMark-ET (Hoff et al ., 2016; Li et al ., 2009; Barnett et al ., 2011) and DIAMOND (Buchfink, Xie & Huson, 2015), to filter redundant training gene structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein coding genes (gene models) in the generated assemblies were predicted using Braker 3 (Stanke et al, 2006(Stanke et al, , 2008Hoff et al, 2016Hoff et al, , 2019Brůna et al, 2021) installed using the Singularity container (available at https://hub.docker.com/r/teambraker/braker3). For H. contortus and H. bakeri, we used short-read RNA-seq data from the Sequence Read Archive (Leinonen, Sugawara & Shumway, 2011) as external evidence for the gene prediction (BioProjects: PRJEB506 (Laing et al, 2013) and PRJNA750155 (Pollo et al, 2023)…”
Section: B) Gene Predic�onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation