Abstract:Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen is a potent transcriptional activator of both viral and cellular promoters. Within the SV40 late promoter, a specific upstream element necessary for T-antigen transcriptional activation is the binding site for transcription-enhancing factor 1 (TEF-1). The promoter structure necessary for T-antigen-mediated transcriptional activation appears to be simple. For example, a promoter consisting of upstream TEF-1 binding sites (or other factor-binding sites) and a downstream TAT… Show more
“…On the other hand, none of the TAFs associated with GST-small t (lanes t). Our laboratory and others have also demonstrated a direct interaction between TBP and large T antigen (Gruda et al 1993;Johnston et al 1996; data not shown). In summary, our results indicate that the association of large T antigen with SL1 is mediated by specific protein-protein contacts with TAFI48 , TAFI110, and TBP.…”
Section: Interactions Between Sv40 Large T Antigen and Tbp-tafissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Several studies have indicated that large T antigen can regulate cell growth, in part, by binding and inactivating the tumor suppressor gene products pRB and p53 (Hinds and Weinberg 1994;Nevins 1994). In addition, large T antigen can transactivate cellular genes, and several studies have indicated that this process is mediated by specific proteinprotein interactions with multiple components of the transcriptional machinery (Gruda et al 1993;Berger et al 1996;Damania and Alwine 1996;Johnston et al 1996). These alterations in the transcriptional activity of specific cellular genes most likely play an important role in the growth-promoting activity induced by large T antigen.…”
“…On the other hand, none of the TAFs associated with GST-small t (lanes t). Our laboratory and others have also demonstrated a direct interaction between TBP and large T antigen (Gruda et al 1993;Johnston et al 1996; data not shown). In summary, our results indicate that the association of large T antigen with SL1 is mediated by specific protein-protein contacts with TAFI48 , TAFI110, and TBP.…”
Section: Interactions Between Sv40 Large T Antigen and Tbp-tafissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Several studies have indicated that large T antigen can regulate cell growth, in part, by binding and inactivating the tumor suppressor gene products pRB and p53 (Hinds and Weinberg 1994;Nevins 1994). In addition, large T antigen can transactivate cellular genes, and several studies have indicated that this process is mediated by specific proteinprotein interactions with multiple components of the transcriptional machinery (Gruda et al 1993;Berger et al 1996;Damania and Alwine 1996;Johnston et al 1996). These alterations in the transcriptional activity of specific cellular genes most likely play an important role in the growth-promoting activity induced by large T antigen.…”
“…Because wild-type p53 inhibits and mutant p53 activates di erent promoters to varying extents Ginsberg et al, 1991;Lechner et al, 1992;Santhanam et al, 1991;Subler et al, 1992), it was not possible to use an internal control such as pSVbGal or RSVbGal (Ludes-Meyers et al, 1996). A similar situation has been recognized for SV40 T antigen-mediated regulation of promoters (Gruda et al, 1993). Therefore, multiple independent experiments (three or more) were done to determine the standard deviations.…”
“…In contrast, mutant T176-708 was completely inactive in both assays. The region spanning amino acids 128 ± 175 overlaps part of region X (spanning amino acids 131 ± 259), which has been suggested to be required for induction of DNA synthesis by T antigen (Dobbelstein et al, 1992) and for interaction with several cellular proteins including the TATA-binding protein and the transcriptional activator TEF-1 (Gruda et al, 1993).…”
Section: Activities Dependent Upon the Amino Terminusmentioning
We have used two di erent, but complementary assays to characterize functions of SV40 T antigen that are necessary for its ability to immortalize rat embryo ®broblasts. In accordance with previous work, we found that several functions were required. These include activities that map to the p53 binding domain and the amino terminal 176 amino acids which contain the J domain as well as the CR1 and CR2 domain required for binding and sequestering the RB family of pocket proteins. Moreover, we found that even though activities dependent only upon the amino terminus were su cient for immortalization they were unable to maintain it. This suggests that immortalization by these amino terminal functions requires either additional events or immortalization of a subset of cells within the heterogeneous rat embryo ®broblast population. We further found that an activity dependent upon amino acids 17 ± 27 which remove a portion of the CR1 domain and the predicted a-1 helix of the J domain was not necessary to maintain growth but was required for direct immortalization suggesting that at least one of the functions required initially was not required to maintain the immortal state. This represents the ®rst demonstration that some of the functions required for maintenance of the immortal state di er from those required for initiation of immortalization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.