1993
DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.11.2775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional activation by recombinant GAL4-VP16 in theXenopus oocyte

Abstract: In addition to measuring transcription in vitro (Gerber et al. 1992) or in transient transfection assays (e.g. Xu et al. 1991), an alternative method to study the function of transcription factors is to inject reporter DNA together with either nuclear extract or factor gene into Xenopus oocytes (Rungger et al. 1990; Theulaz et al. 1988). Here we introduce the GALA-derived assay, which was established in other systems, to study transcriptional activation in the frog oocyte. In our experiment, purified recombina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, when we injected DNA template into the Xenopus oocyte, it was first relaxed and then organized into a chromatin structure within 120 min, as measured by supercoil density (data not shown). Chromatin formation prior to the injection of transcription factor did not alter the transcriptional response: When we separately injected the factor 3 hours later than the reporter template, we observed a similar level of transcription to that in coinjection experiments (our unpublished data; see also Xu et al, 1993). So far, however, we do not know whether organization of chromatin is necessary for the transcription effects observed.…”
Section: Is a Chromatin Structure Required For The Enhancer Effect?supporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, when we injected DNA template into the Xenopus oocyte, it was first relaxed and then organized into a chromatin structure within 120 min, as measured by supercoil density (data not shown). Chromatin formation prior to the injection of transcription factor did not alter the transcriptional response: When we separately injected the factor 3 hours later than the reporter template, we observed a similar level of transcription to that in coinjection experiments (our unpublished data; see also Xu et al, 1993). So far, however, we do not know whether organization of chromatin is necessary for the transcription effects observed.…”
Section: Is a Chromatin Structure Required For The Enhancer Effect?supporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, unlike the transfection experiments in mammalian HeLa cells (Seipel et a/., 1992), reference gene signals are of limited value in the Xenopus system described here. Ref signals were often reduced by the expression of particular transactivator and/or test genes (see also Xu et a/., 1993). This effect is probably due to intracellular competition for limiting factors.…”
Section: Strong and Moderate Stimulation By Gal4-vp16(40n) Protein Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Gal4-VP16 has been widely adopted to express exogenous and endogenous genes of interest at high levels in a number of plant and animal systems. [12][13][14] An additional elegant refinement is the split Gal4 expression system developed for Drosophila. 15 In this technique, transcription is restricted to the intersection of expression from two different promoters, with one regulating the Gal4 DNA binding domain fused with a synthetic leucine zipper and the other regulating a complementary leucine zipper fused to the activation domain of Gal4 or VP16.…”
Section: Introduction To the Gal4=uas Transcriptional Activation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). GAL4-based binary systems controlling transgene expression have been used successfully in different organisms, including Drosophila, zebrafish and Xenopus (Fischer et al, 1988;Grabher and Wittbrodt, 2004;Halpern et al, 2008;Xu et al, 1993). However, since the GAL4 transactivation domain is a potential caspase substrate (van Criekinge et al, 1999), it was exchanged for that of the Herpes simplex virus VP16 gene, which is insensitive to caspase cleavage (van Criekinge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Basic Design Of the Reporter Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%