Transcription factor Olig2 defines subpopulations of retinal progenitor cells biased toward specific cell fates

Single progenitors can give rise to any and all of the main retinal cell types: photoreceptors, interneurons (horizontal, bipolar, and amacrine cells), retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), and glia. Many of these types are divisible into multiple functionally, structurally, and molecularly distinct subtypes (e.g., ∼25 for RGCs). It remains unknown when and how progenitors become committed to generate such subtypes. Here, we determine the origin of RGCs that respond selectively to vertical motion and express cadherin 6 (cdh6). Using Cre recombinase-based lineage tracing, we show that these RGCs arise from progenitors that themselves express cdh6. These progenitors are capable of generating all major retinal cell types, but the RGCs they generate are predominantly of the single direction-selective subtype. In contrast, cdh6-positive progenitors retain the ability to generate multiple subtypes of amacrine and bipolar cells. Our results demonstrate that type and subtype specification are regulated in different ways and suggest that multipotential but fate-restricted progenitors contribute to subtype specification in retina.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells arise from molecularly specified multipotential progenitors

Huerta

Kim

Voinescu

et al. 2012

“…In the mouse, this transition occurs with the onset of Ascl1; the earliest retinal progenitors do not express Ascl1, and, with its onset, the progenitors no longer produce ganglion cells (3). The other early-generated cell types, the cones and horizontal cells, are included in the Ascl1 + progenitor lineage, but are overrepresented in clones from Olig2 + progenitors (4). The rods and amacrine cells also are overrepresented in the postnatal Olig2 + progenitors whereas another late progenitor marker, Sox9, is necessary for the generation of Müller glia.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conserved microRNA pathway regulates developmental timing of retinal neurogenesis

Torre

Georgi²,

Reh

2013

198

189

Most regions of the vertebrate central nervous system develop by the sequential addition of different classes of neurons and glia. This phenomenon has been best characterized in laminated structures like the retina and the cerebral cortex, in which the progenitor cells in these structures are thought to change in their competence as development proceeds to generate different types of neurons in a stereotypic sequence that is conserved across vertebrates. We previously reported that conditional deletion of Dicer prevents the change in competence of progenitors to generate later-born cell types, suggesting that specific microRNAs (miRNAs) are required for this developmental transition. In this report, we now show that three miRNAs, let-7, miR-125, and miR-9, are key regulators of the early to late developmental transition in retinal progenitors: (i) members of these three miRNA families increase over the relevant developmental period in normal retinal progenitors; (ii) inhibiting the function of these miRNAs produces changes in retinal development similar to Dicer CKO; (iii) overexpression of members of these three miRNA families in Dicer-CKO retinas can rescue the phenotype, allowing their progression to late progenitors; (iv) overexpression of these miRNAs can accelerate normal retinal development; (v) microarray and computational analyses of Dicer-CKO retinal cells identified two potential targets of the late-progenitor miRNAs: Protogenin (Prtg) and Lin28b; and (vi) overexpression of either Lin28 or Prtg can maintain the early progenitor state. Together, these data demonstrate that a conserved miRNA pathway controls a key step in the progression of temporal identity in retinal progenitors.heterochronic | progenitor competence

“…Many such transcription factors have been identified by loss-and gain-of-function analyses, but these studies often fail to reveal the specific roles these factors play in the development of the cell types with which they are involved (7)(8)(9). RPCs are heterogeneous, as has been demonstrated by the nonuniform expression of many RPC genes (10)(11)(12)(13). RPCs expressing specific genes, particularly those encoding transcription factors, although still multipotent, tend to be biased for certain retinal cell types.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Two transcription factors, Pou4f2 and Isl1, are sufficient to specify the retinal ganglion cell fate

Kaczynski

Sethuramanujam

et al. 2015

101

111

As with other retinal cell types, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) arise from multipotent retinal progenitor cells (RPCs), and their formation is regulated by a hierarchical gene-regulatory network (GRN). Within this GRN, three transcription factors-atonal homolog 7 (Atoh7), POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 2 (Pou4f2), and insulin gene enhancer protein 1 (Isl1)-occupy key node positions at two different stages of RGC development. Atoh7 is upstream and is required for RPCs to gain competence for an RGC fate, whereas Pou4f2 and Isl1 are downstream and regulate RGC differentiation. However, the genetic and molecular basis for the specification of the RGC fate, a key step in RGC development, remains unclear. Here we report that ectopic expression of Pou4f2 and Isl1 in the Atoh7-null retina using a binary knockin-transgenic system is sufficient for the specification of the RGC fate. The RGCs thus formed are largely normal in gene expression, survive to postnatal stages, and are physiologically functional. Our results indicate that Pou4f2 and Isl1 compose a minimally sufficient regulatory core for the RGC fate. We further conclude that during development a core group of limited transcription factors, including Pou4f2 and Isl1, function downstream of Atoh7 to determine the RGC fate and initiate RGC differentiation.retinal development | neural development | transcription factors | cell fate specification | gene regulation A central question in neural development is how the extreme cellular diversity in the central nervous system arises from multipotent neural progenitors. The neural retina is an excellent system to address this question because of its well-defined structure and stereotypical cellular composition. The six neuronal cell types and one glial cell type (Müller glia) form a welllaminated tissue with the various types of cells positioned at distinct layers (1). Many of these cell types are composed of multiple subtypes with distinct functions (2). All cell types in the retina originate from a common pool of retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) following a distinct temporal order (3-5). The ordered births of the retinal cell types are caused by changes of competence in RPCs for the various retinal cell types (6). Both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms are involved in regulating the production of the various retinal cell types, but the intrinsic factors, mostly transcription factors, appear to play more deterministic roles in directing progenitor cells toward specific cell fates (5). Many such transcription factors have been identified by loss-and gain-of-function analyses, but these studies often fail to reveal the specific roles these factors play in the development of the cell types with which they are involved (7-9). RPCs are heterogeneous, as has been demonstrated by the nonuniform expression of many RPC genes (10-13). RPCs expressing specific genes, particularly those encoding transcription factors, although still multipotent, tend to be biased for certain retinal cell types. In a few cases, specific fac...