1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01626.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcription activation at Class I CAP‐dependent promoters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
200
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(16 reference statements)
9
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The architecture of the yfiD promoter is therefore unlike any other previously analysed FNR-activated promoter (Guest et al, 1996) and the contribution of each FNR site to the overall regulation of yfiD expression is being investigated. The genes regulated by the CRP/ FNR family can be grouped into three classes based on ᮊ 1997 Blackwell Science Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 24, 593-605 the position of the DNA site for the regulator and the requirements for transcription activation (Ebright, 1993). Class I promoters have CRP/FNR sites centred at or near ¹61.5, ¹72.5, ¹82.5 or ¹92.5, and thus the yfiD promoter is a variant of the Class I type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architecture of the yfiD promoter is therefore unlike any other previously analysed FNR-activated promoter (Guest et al, 1996) and the contribution of each FNR site to the overall regulation of yfiD expression is being investigated. The genes regulated by the CRP/ FNR family can be grouped into three classes based on ᮊ 1997 Blackwell Science Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 24, 593-605 the position of the DNA site for the regulator and the requirements for transcription activation (Ebright, 1993). Class I promoters have CRP/FNR sites centred at or near ¹61.5, ¹72.5, ¹82.5 or ¹92.5, and thus the yfiD promoter is a variant of the Class I type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AR1 contact between regulator RNA polymerase is a feature of both Class I and Class I1 promoters (Savery et al, 1996). For CRP at Class I1 promoters the role of the AR1 contact is that of anti-inhibition (Niu et al, 1996), whereas at Class I promoters AR1 makes an activating contact with the a subunit of RNA polymerase (Ebright, 1993). The results obtained with FNR-R184P suggest that the AR1 contact at Class I promoters (FNR contacts the downstream a subunit of RNA polymerase) may not be identical to that at Class I1 promoters (FNR contacts the upstream a subunit) and that R184 may be more involved in making an anti-inhibition (Class 11) rather than an activating contact (Class I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as the position of the FNR-binding site at the hZyE promoter is always beyond -41, hZyE is a Class I promoter (Ebright, 1993).…”
Section: The My€ Promoter Contains An Fnr Site and Is Differentially mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In E. coli, the CRPdependent promoters are grouped into three classes. Class I has a single CRP-binding site, centred at one of the positions 261?5, 271?5, 281?5 or 291?5; class II possesses a CRPrecognition site centred at 241?5, which thus overlaps with the 235 sequence; and class III requires two or more CRPbinding sites in the promoter for full activation (Busby & Ebright, 1999;Ebright, 1993;Ushida & Aiba, 1990). Based on the position of the CRP-recognition sequence 258?5 nt upstream of the TSP, the M. tuberculosis whiB1 promoter region most resembles the class I CRP-dependent promoters of E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%