2022
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial ultrasound simulations: A review

Abstract: Transcranial ultrasound is more and more used for therapy and imaging of the brain. However, the skull is a highly attenuating and aberrating medium, with different structures and acoustic properties among samples and even within a sample. Thus, case‐specific simulations are needed to perform transcranial focused ultrasound interventions safely. In this article, we provide a review of the different methods used to model the skull and to simulate ultrasound propagation through it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, it is possible to predict the pressure field, incorporate US thermal and nonthermal effects (Tyler K. Hornsby, Jakhmola, et al, 2023; Tyler K. Hornsby, Kashkooli, et al, 2023), and predict the biological effects on the tumor and surrounding structures. Particularly for more complex circumstances (such as brain surgery via the intact skull), extensive mathematical modeling is necessary to calculate the ultrasonic exposure parameters (Angla et al, 2023; Kyriakou et al, 2015). An overview of TUS propagation modeling can be found in (Huttunen et al, 2005), and a comparison of analytical, semi‐analytical and computational approaches is provided in (Kundu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Computational Models For Tus Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, it is possible to predict the pressure field, incorporate US thermal and nonthermal effects (Tyler K. Hornsby, Jakhmola, et al, 2023; Tyler K. Hornsby, Kashkooli, et al, 2023), and predict the biological effects on the tumor and surrounding structures. Particularly for more complex circumstances (such as brain surgery via the intact skull), extensive mathematical modeling is necessary to calculate the ultrasonic exposure parameters (Angla et al, 2023; Kyriakou et al, 2015). An overview of TUS propagation modeling can be found in (Huttunen et al, 2005), and a comparison of analytical, semi‐analytical and computational approaches is provided in (Kundu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Computational Models For Tus Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no definitive method for producing maps of acoustic properties (density, speed of sound, and attenuation) from CT or MRI data. Different approaches to producing these maps have been reviewed by Angla et al [6]. Acoustic maps derived from CT scans facilitated the development of procedures approved for use in clinic [20], but this process has been in a very specific set of conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Investigation On Mapping Functions Between Ct Scan...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling transcranial ultrasound has been an intense research topic for the last 20 years. Angla et al recently presented a thorough and excellent review on this topic [6]. While several modeling approaches have been crossvalidated in simplified numerical settings [7], there are few to none open-accessible complete modeling suites that work in integration with neuronavigation systems to assist FUS-based neuromodulation experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most transcranial simulations are based on numerical methods, such as finite differences (Aubry et al 2003) or k-space (Jing et al 2012), especially since the development of the Matlab toolbox k-Wave (Treeby et al 2018) in 2010. These methods take into account many complex physical phenomenons and allow a heterogeneous description of the skull (Angla et al 2023a). However, they require a spatial step small enough to converge, making them quite slow and memory demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%