2002
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.59.3.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Essential Tremor

Abstract: This exploratory study of the potential therapeutic properties of rTMS on essential tremor showed an acute antitremor effect. Further investigation in search of a more lasting benefit is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
67
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most interesting, transcranial magnetic stimulation, applied on the occipital area (in the region of the inion), has the same temporary mitigating effect as ethanol on tremor symptoms. 21 Given the shallow range of the magnetic pulses in transcranial magnetic stimulation, unless the visual cortex is inexplicably implicated in the disease, we conclude that the cerebellum is at least partially involved in tremor and that the body of research that focused on this structure is vindicated.…”
Section: Options and Reticence In Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Most interesting, transcranial magnetic stimulation, applied on the occipital area (in the region of the inion), has the same temporary mitigating effect as ethanol on tremor symptoms. 21 Given the shallow range of the magnetic pulses in transcranial magnetic stimulation, unless the visual cortex is inexplicably implicated in the disease, we conclude that the cerebellum is at least partially involved in tremor and that the body of research that focused on this structure is vindicated.…”
Section: Options and Reticence In Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4A, graph). In other diseases, evidence that a specific site of noninvasive stimulation is ineffective is not as strong; however, in general, stimulation of cerebellum appears to be more effective for essential tremor than stimulation of M1 (53)(54)(55)(56)(57), stimulation of M1 appears to be more effective for pain than stimulation of DLPFC (58)(59)(60)(61), and stimulation of the left DLPFC appears to be more effective for depression than stimulation of the cranial vertex (top of the head) (17). In all cases, the DBS site with the best evidence of efficacy was significantly more connected to the sites where noninvasive stimulation was effective than to sites where noninvasive stimulation was ineffective, with connectivity to the ineffective site falling at or below the connectivity to random sites (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials have been conducted to test magnetic field therapies in managing pain [39,40], tremor [41], epilepsy [42], and migraine headaches [43]. No data support their role in any illness.…”
Section: Energy Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%