Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the semi-quantitative, pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery

Glasby, M. A.; Henderson, Lindsay; Horsburgh, Gillian; Jordan, Brian J.; Michaelson, Ciara; Adams, C. I.; Garrido, Enrique

doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4737-4

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has not yet been documented whether the results of MEP recordings induced by the transcranial single magnetic stimulus can be compared with MEPs induced with the trains of electrical stimuli applied intraoperatively for diagnostic evaluation of the spinal neural transmission. The results provided by Glasby et al [33] suggest that these measurements may be used comparatively and semi-quantitatively to compare pre-, intra-, and postoperative functional integrity of the spinal cord structures in cases of deformities surgery. It should be, however, remembered that trains of stimuli applied transcranially during neuromonitoring may cause the temporal and perhaps the spatial summation of the efferent impulses to the spinal motoneurones, which are mediated polysynaptically, and therefore, the latency and amplitude parameters of MEPs may show the variability [34].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis

Daroszewski,

Huber,

Kaczmarek

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationships between the results of pre- and intraoperative motor evoked potential recordings during neuromonitoring and whether idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgical correction improves the spinal efferent transmission have not been specified in detail. This study aims to compare the results of surface-recorded electromyography (EMG), electroneurography (ENG, M, and F-waves), and especially motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from tibialis anterior muscle (TA) bilaterally in 353 girls with right idiopathic scoliosis (types 1–3 according to Lenke classification). It has not yet been documented whether the results of MEP recordings induced by transcranial single magnetic stimulus (TMS, pre- and postoperatively) and trains of electrical stimuli (TES; intraoperatively in T0—before surgery, T1—after pedicle screws implantation, and T2—after scoliosis curvature distraction and derotation following two-rod implantation) can be compared for diagnostic verification of the improvement of spinal cord neural transmission. We attempted to determine whether the constant level of optimal anesthesia during certain surgical steps of scoliosis treatment affects the parameters of MEPs recorded during neuromonitoring procedures. No neurological deficits have been observed postoperatively. The values of amplitudes but not latencies in MEP recordings evoked with TMS in IS patients compared before and after surgery indicated a slight improvement in efferent neural transmission. The results of all neurophysiological studies in IS patients were significantly asymmetrical and recorded worse on the concave side, suggesting greater neurological motor deficits at p = 0.04. The surgeries brought significant improvement (p = 0.04) in the parameters of amplitudes of sEMG recordings; however, the consequences of abnormalities in the activity of TA motor units were still reflected. ENG study results showed the symptoms of the axonal-type injury in peroneal motor fibers improving only on the concave side at p = 0.04, in parallel with F-wave parameters, which suggests that derotation and distraction might result in restoring the proper relations of the lumbar ventral roots in the spinal central canal, resembling their decompression. There were no significant differences detected in the amplitudes or latencies of MEPs induced with TMS or TES when comparing the parameters recorded preoperatively and intraoperatively in T0. The amplitudes of TES-evoked MEPs increased gradually at p = 0.04 in the subsequent periods (T1 and T2) of observation. A reduction in MEP latency at p = 0.05 was observed only at the end of the IS surgery. Studies on the possible connections between the level of anesthesia fluctuations and the required TMS stimulus strength, as well as the MEP amplitude changes measured in T0–T2, revealed a lack of relationships. These might not be the factors influencing the efferent transmission in spinal pathways beside the surgical procedures. Pre- (TMS-evoked) and intraoperative (TES-evoked) recordings are reliable for evaluating the patient’s neurological status before and during surgical scoliosis correction procedures. An increase in MEP amplitude parameters recorded on both sides after scoliosis surgery proves the immediate improvement of the total efferent spinal cord transmission. Considering comparative pre- and postoperative sEMG and ENG recordings, it can be concluded that surgeries might directly result in additional lumbar ventral root decompression. We can conclude that MEP parameter changes are determined by the surgery procedures during neuromonitoring, not the anesthesia conditions if they are kept stable, which influences a decrease in the number of false-positive neuromonitoring warnings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis

Daroszewski,

Huber,

Kaczmarek

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This indicates the importance of a preoperative neurophysiological assessment, showing the current neurological status of a patient with IS, which should also be expected in the perioperative period for the purposes of neuromonitoring, constituting a source of valuable knowledge for both the neurophysiologist and the surgeon. The same opinion is shared by Glasby et al [58], Virk et al [59], and Lo et al [57], who also underline that the early recognition of the MEP properties is important to prevent false positives during the course of IONM for spinal surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

“Real-Time Neuromonitoring” Increases the Safety and Non-Invasiveness and Shortens the Duration of Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

Daroszewski,

Huber,

Kaczmarek

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: A practical solution to the incidental unreliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) may be the simultaneous neurophysiological recording and control of the surgical field through a camera (the concept of “Real-time” IONM). During “Real-time” IONM, the surgeon is immediately warned about the possibility of damage to the neural structures during, but not after, standard idiopathic scoliosis (IS) corrective surgery procedures (the concept of “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” interactive, verbal IONM). This study aimed to compare the advantages, utilities, reliabilities, and time consumption of the two IONM scenarios. Methods: Studies were performed in two similar groups of patients undergoing surgery primarily due to Lenke 2 idiopathic scoliosis (N = 120), when both IONM approaches were applied. Neurophysiological evaluations of the spinal transmission were performed pre- (T0), intra- (before (T1) and after (T2) surgery), and postoperatively (T3), as well as once in healthy volunteers (control, N = 60). Non-invasive and innovative recordings of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally from the peroneal (PER) nerve and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle were performed with surface electrodes as a result of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electrical stimulation (TES) at T0–T3. Results: In both groups, the MEP amplitudes and latencies recorded from the PER nerve were approximately 67% lower and 3.1 ms shorter than those recorded from the TA muscle. The MEP recording parameters differed similarly at T0–T3 compared to the control group. In all patients, the MEP parameters induced by TMS (T0) and TES (T1) did not differ. The MEP amplitude parameters recorded from the TA and PER at T1 and T2 indicated a bilateral improvement in the neural spinal conduction due to the surgical intervention. The TMS-induced MEP amplitude at T3 further increased bilaterally. In both IONM groups, an average 51.8 BIS level of anesthesia did not affect the variability in the MEP amplitude, especially in the PER recordings when the applied TES strength was 98.2 mA. The number of fluctuations in the MEP parameters was closely related to the number of warnings from the neurophysiologist during the transpedicular screw implantation, corrective rod implantation, and distraction, derotation, and compression procedures, and it was higher in the “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” IONM group. The average duration of surgery was shorter by approximately one hour in the “Real-time” IONM group. The number of two-way communications between the surgeon and the neurophysiologist and vice versa in the “Real-time” IONM group decreased by approximately half. Conclusions: This study proves the superiority of using “Real-time” IONM over the standard “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” IONM procedure in increasing the safety and non-invasiveness, shortening the time, and lowering the costs of the surgical treatment of IS patients. The modifications of the MEP nerve-conduction-recording technology with surface electrodes from nerves enable precise and reliable information on the pediatric patient’s neurological condition at every stage of the applied surgical procedures, even under conditions of slight fluctuations in anesthesia.

show abstract

“…Preoperative CMAP and TMS measurements were taken to assess if the patients were eligible for monitoring [19]. TMS was elicitable in 14 patients (93.3%) with DMD.…”

Section: Preoperative Cmap and Tmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during scoliosis surgery in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Little is known about the reliability and value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of IONM and the cortical excitability in these patients. Methods Fifteen patients with DMD and scoliosis and 15 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) underwent scoliosis correction surgery with the use of IONM. IONM consisted of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring. The highest Tc-MEP amplitudes were collected to test the feasibility. Preoperative compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-MEPs were recorded to test the cortical excitability. SSEPs were scored as elicitable or not elicitable. Results Tc-MEP amplitudes were significantly lower in the DMD group for both the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles. However, the abductor hallucis muscle had similar amplitudes in both the DMD as the AIS group. TMS/CMAP and Tc-MEP/CMAP ratios were similar in the DMD and AIS group (P = 0.126 and P = 0.792 respectively). Conclusions Tc-MEP and SSEP monitoring is feasible, particularly when Tc-MEPs are recorded from the abductor hallucis muscle in patients with DMD. Similar TMS/CMAP and Tc-MEP/CMAP ratios show that there were no differences observed in cortical excitability between the groups. IONM seems a feasible and valuable neurophysiological tool to signal possible surgically induced damage to the spinal cord during scoliosis correction surgery in patients with DMD.

show abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the semi-quantitative, pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery

Abstract: The congruency of mMEP and eMEP and of mCMCT and eCMCT suggests that these measurements may be used comparatively and semi-quantitatively for the comparison of pre-, intra-, and post-operative spinal cord function in spinal deformity surgery.

Cited by 7 publications

References 18 publications

Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis

Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis

“Real-Time Neuromonitoring” Increases the Safety and Non-Invasiveness and Shortens the Duration of Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during scoliosis surgery in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About