1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00056-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a diagnostic and prognostic test in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…9,14,15,34,40,46,47 In agreement with Rösler et al, 42 we observed no instances of abnormal CMCT associated with normal TST in any of our ALS patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,14,15,34,40,46,47 In agreement with Rösler et al, 42 we observed no instances of abnormal CMCT associated with normal TST in any of our ALS patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…CMCT is reportedly not a sensitive variable for the diagnosis of ALS. 9,14,15,34,40,46,47 A decrease in SP duration 1,11,40,43,45 or an increase in RMT 47 seem to be sensitive variables for diagnosing ALS. By contrast, the amplitude of the MEP is not a reliable marker of UMN dysfunction; even in healthy subjects, MEPs are much smaller than the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by peripheral stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…And, unfortunately, methods for assessing upper motor neuron dysfunction in the disease are decidedly limited. However, in the early 1990s, several studies showed that cortical excitability was altered in ALS by the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [69][70][71]. Many studies since then have been pursued, and a number of measures appear to be altered in ALS, including motor threshold (generally reduced early in the disease, supporting the presence of increased excitability), motor-evoked potential (generally also increased early in the disease), central motor conduction time (generally prolonged in the disease), and cortical silent period (reduced in the disease) [72].…”
Section: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the SP shortening in ALS seems to reflect the reduced activation of cortical or spinal inhibitory networks by the abnormal corticospinal pathway. 4,5,19,33 In these studies, it was found that the resting motor threshold, size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and ratio between amplitude of MEP elicited by TMS and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) obtained by supramaximal electrical nerve stimulation are not very sensitive means of monitoring changes occurring in the course of the disease. Although the decrease in duration of the silent period (SP) is reportedly a sensitive variable for diagnosing ALS, 1,6,23,28 conflicting results have been published 19,33 about the time-related changes in this parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%