2001
DOI: 10.1227/00006123-200105000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for Brain Tumor Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
42
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Currently, it is acceptable that a persistent intraoperative MEP reduction of >50% is associated with postoperative motor deficits. 15,16 Cranial nerve paresis is usually an inevitable byproduct of treating MCF tumors. The oculomotor and trochlear nerves are the most vulnerable nerves resulting in this complication owing to the trajectory through the cavernous sinus and tentorial incisura.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Currently, it is acceptable that a persistent intraoperative MEP reduction of >50% is associated with postoperative motor deficits. 15,16 Cranial nerve paresis is usually an inevitable byproduct of treating MCF tumors. The oculomotor and trochlear nerves are the most vulnerable nerves resulting in this complication owing to the trajectory through the cavernous sinus and tentorial incisura.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,7,18,19,34,40,48,60 Intraoperative mapping and monitoring involving CMAPs is a valid modality for reducing iatrogenic morbidity during surgery in and around the central region as well as for intracranial aneurysms. 7,10,11,26,38,39,42,44,[49][50][51][52]62 Two methods are used for intraoperative mapping and monitoring during surgery in and around the insula. The first is the TCES of the motor cortex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) In the present case, the enhanced lesion was located in the cerebral peduncle, so MEPs were monitored following transcranial high-voltage stimulation together with direct peduncular stimulation. 12,26) Transcranial MEP seems to be the obvious candidate because stimulation evokes large and multiple descending motor volleys. 16) In our experience, high-voltage (600 V) stimulation can reach a deep site including the brain stem, whereas relatively low voltage (300-400 V) stimulation after craniotomy can be localized near the motor cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%