2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Electric Stimulation for Precision Medicine: A Spatiomechanistic Framework

Abstract: During recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in general, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in particular, have created new hopes for treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Despite promising primary results in some brain disorders, a more widespread application of tES is hindered by the unsolved question of determining optimum stimulation protocols to receive meaningful therapeutic effects. tES has a large parameter space … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomarker development incorporating multimodal measures, rather than a single modality, and taking advantage of both the high spatial resolution of fMRI and high temporal resolution of EEG is likely to provide a more complete picture of both the cognitive functions and the underlying mechanisms dysregulated in SUD. Identification of biomarkers for both risk and protective factors and targets for treatment will likely uncover a proximal, brain-based measure of dependence essential for individualized medicine and curbing the significant societal impact of SUDs (Yavari et al, 2017).…”
Section: Biomarkers For Treatment Selection and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarker development incorporating multimodal measures, rather than a single modality, and taking advantage of both the high spatial resolution of fMRI and high temporal resolution of EEG is likely to provide a more complete picture of both the cognitive functions and the underlying mechanisms dysregulated in SUD. Identification of biomarkers for both risk and protective factors and targets for treatment will likely uncover a proximal, brain-based measure of dependence essential for individualized medicine and curbing the significant societal impact of SUDs (Yavari et al, 2017).…”
Section: Biomarkers For Treatment Selection and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation effects of tES on cognitive and motor functions could be understood from different mechanistic levels ( Yavari et al, 2017 ). On the neurochemical level, neurotransmitters associated with cognitive functions [glutamatergic ( N -methyl- D -aspartate) ( Liebetanz et al, 2002 ; Nitsche et al, 2003 , 2004a,b ) and γ-aminobutyric acid–ergic receptors ( Nitsche et al, 2004c )] relate to tES long-term effects; on the neuroelectrical level, cortical neuronal excitability increased/decreased under anodal/cathodal tDCS ( Nitsche and Paulus, 2000 , 2001 ); on the brain oscillatory level, tES modifies brain waves and their synchronizations ( Keeser et al, 2011b ; Jacobson et al, 2012 ; Herrmann et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Mechanics Of Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical stimulation is an efficacious therapeutic modality for neurological disorders, such as stroke, depression, and schizophrenia [1][2][3][4][5] . In this system, an electrical stimulus is delivered either invasively, e.g., deep brain stimulation (DBS), or non-invasively, e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES).…”
Section: Analyzing the Advantages Of Subcutaneous Over Transcutaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%