2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Improves Cognitive Control in Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Behavioral and Neurophysiological Study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of group differences in QEEG spectral power, and the pattern of The lack of any tDCS effect on QEEG measures contrasts with previous evidence of reduced absolute theta power during rest after a single session of anodal compared to sham tDCS over the rIFC in adults without ADHD [40]. Another study in 15 adolescents with ADHD found enhanced ERP amplitudes (e.g., N2 and P3) [37,38] during an n-back WM task after a single-session of conventional anodal tDCS or HD-tDCS over rIFC. Nevertheless, our findings support studies that used more fine-grained measures of EEG activity and failed to identify differences between anodal and sham tDCS over the left DLPFC in EEG connectivity during rest in 50 adults with ADHD [39], or any effect on both rest-and taskbased EEG power spectrum following anodal tDCS in neurotypical adults [44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absence of group differences in QEEG spectral power, and the pattern of The lack of any tDCS effect on QEEG measures contrasts with previous evidence of reduced absolute theta power during rest after a single session of anodal compared to sham tDCS over the rIFC in adults without ADHD [40]. Another study in 15 adolescents with ADHD found enhanced ERP amplitudes (e.g., N2 and P3) [37,38] during an n-back WM task after a single-session of conventional anodal tDCS or HD-tDCS over rIFC. Nevertheless, our findings support studies that used more fine-grained measures of EEG activity and failed to identify differences between anodal and sham tDCS over the left DLPFC in EEG connectivity during rest in 50 adults with ADHD [39], or any effect on both rest-and taskbased EEG power spectrum following anodal tDCS in neurotypical adults [44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In a double-blind, crossover RCT study with 10 adolescents with ADHD, single-session conventional anodal tDCS, anodal High Definition (HD)-tDCS or sham tDCS over rIFC led to enhanced N2 and P3 amplitude during an n-back WM task compared to sham [37]. In a double-blind RCT, 37 adults with ADHD received single sessions of sham or anodal tDCS over left or right DLPFC in a crossover design, with 18 participants performing an Eriksen Flanker task and 19 performing a Stop Signal task [38]. Participants showed reduced reaction times following left DLPFC and increased P3 amplitude following right and left DLPFC compared to sham in the Eriksen flanker task only, suggesting evidence of improved interference, but not response inhibition [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was furthermore correlated with increased left and right P300 increase in EEG measures on incongruent trials after left and right DLPFC stimulation compared to sham, respectively and with reduced N200 amplitude after left compared to right DLPFC stimulation. In the Stop task, there was no effect in inhibitory measures but left DLPFC stimulation relative to sham increased Go reaction time, which was correlated with increased P200 amplitude during go trials (Dubreuil-Vall et al, 2020).…”
Section: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This was furthermore correlated with increased left and right P300 increase in EEG measures on incongruent trials after left and right DLPFC stimulation compared to sham, respectively and with reduced N200 amplitude after left compared to right DLPFC stimulation. In the stop task, there was no effect in inhibitory measures, but left DLPFC stimulation relative to sham increased Go reaction time, which was correlated with increased P200 amplitude during Go trials (Dubreuil-Vall et al, 2020) [179].…”
Section: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%