2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

45
2,216
8
59

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,644 publications
(2,328 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
45
2,216
8
59
Order By: Relevance
“…tDCS was chosen as it can modulate intrinsic neuronal activity using a weak, constant electrical current (Nitsche et al., 2008) to facilitate cognitive processing including learning and memory (Asthana et al., 2013; Coffman, Clark, & Parasuraman, 2014; Mungee et al., 2014). This work aligns with the rapidly growing body of research that indicates tDCS may have beneficial effects for psychiatric conditions associated with altered prefrontal activity or connectivity, including depression (Drevets, Price, & Furey, 2008), schizophrenia (Meyer‐Lindenberg et al., 2002), and obsessive–compulsive disorder (Chamberlain et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tDCS was chosen as it can modulate intrinsic neuronal activity using a weak, constant electrical current (Nitsche et al., 2008) to facilitate cognitive processing including learning and memory (Asthana et al., 2013; Coffman, Clark, & Parasuraman, 2014; Mungee et al., 2014). This work aligns with the rapidly growing body of research that indicates tDCS may have beneficial effects for psychiatric conditions associated with altered prefrontal activity or connectivity, including depression (Drevets, Price, & Furey, 2008), schizophrenia (Meyer‐Lindenberg et al., 2002), and obsessive–compulsive disorder (Chamberlain et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reorganisation, or neuroplasticity, is mediated, at least in part, by activity or use-dependent processes that involve synaptic modification inducing either long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of synapses (Sanes and Donoghue 2000). As well as the brain reorganization that occurs in response to activity or use (use-dependent neuroplasticity), there is good evidence to suggest that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) also induces similar neuroplastic changes in the central nervous system, at least for a short period of time (<1hr) (Nitsche et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tDCS is thought to induce shifts in transmembrane neuronal potentials and, thus, influence corticospinal excitability (Nitsche et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If modulation of physiological processes results in functional alterations, a causal relationship can be assumed. In the last years, a couple of such stimulation protocols have become available, allowing non-invasive modulation of brain activity and excitability, and thus are principally suited to serve this aim [12][13][14][15] . In this review, we give an overview of the principal mechanisms of the tools, and their applications for the exploration of prefrontal functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%