2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial direct current stimulation improves visual acuity in amblyopic Long-Evans rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15] Along the same lines, Thompson et al, 16 Clavagnier et al, 17 and Moret et al 18 showed that contrast sensitivity improvements for the amblyopic could be made in adults with amblyopia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation. In an animal study, Castano-Castano et al 19 found that amblyopic rats can produced an almost full recovery in visual acuity after eight sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the visual cortex. Although the mechanism of action here is unclear, rTMS and Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) change the balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain and are likely to be also targeting interocular suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13][14][15] Along the same lines, Thompson et al, 16 Clavagnier et al, 17 and Moret et al 18 showed that contrast sensitivity improvements for the amblyopic could be made in adults with amblyopia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation. In an animal study, Castano-Castano et al 19 found that amblyopic rats can produced an almost full recovery in visual acuity after eight sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the visual cortex. Although the mechanism of action here is unclear, rTMS and Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) change the balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain and are likely to be also targeting interocular suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an animal study, Castano-Castano et al. 19 found that amblyopic rats can produced an almost full recovery in visual acuity after eight sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the visual cortex. Although the mechanism of action here is unclear, rTMS and Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) change the balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain and are likely to be also targeting interocular suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors pointed out the vergence-accommodation conflict as responsible of the visual discomfort associated with the use of VR HMDs [ 28 ], which appears to be more likely to occur at closer viewing distances [ 29 ]. Likewise, neurological events can also occur with this therapy as a result of high sensitivity to overexcitation in some cortical regions of the subject, as has been also reported with other neuromodulation techniques, developed to improve visual function in amblyopia, such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) [ 30 33 ] or repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) [ 34 , 35 ]. All these issues should be considered when designing future clinical studies that intend to use VR HMDs as stereoscopic tools with rehabilitation aims.…”
Section: Supporting Evidencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Another reason for the significance of adult plasticity is that it may contribute to the development of treatments for human sensory impairments, such as amblyopia 124 . A series of treatments, including transcranial direct current stimulation 125 and high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation 126 , have been tried to cure amblyopia. Studies of the critical period study are helpful in determining the optimal timing of those treatments.…”
Section: Neurodevelopment and Critical Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%