2014
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.2992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial cavitation detection in primates during blood-brain barrier opening-a performance assessment study

Abstract: Focused ultrasound (FUS) has been shown promise in treating the brain locally and noninvasively. Transcranial passive cavitation detection (PCD) provides methodology of monitoring the treatment in real time, while the skull effects remain a major challenge for its translation to the clinic. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity, reliability, and limitations of PCD through primate (macaque and human) skulls in vitro. The results were further correlated with the in vivo macaque studies including the tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In FUS-induced BBB opening, 20,[32][33][34][35][36][37] sonothrombolysis, [38][39][40][41][42] and histotripsy 43,44 studies, correlations between the cavitation activity measured using a single-element passive cavitation detector (PCD) and treatment outcome have been reported. Moreover, microbubble emissions have been used to select treatment pressures 36 and modulate them in real-time between subsequent therapy pulses 35 during FUS-induced BBB opening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FUS-induced BBB opening, 20,[32][33][34][35][36][37] sonothrombolysis, [38][39][40][41][42] and histotripsy 43,44 studies, correlations between the cavitation activity measured using a single-element passive cavitation detector (PCD) and treatment outcome have been reported. Moreover, microbubble emissions have been used to select treatment pressures 36 and modulate them in real-time between subsequent therapy pulses 35 during FUS-induced BBB opening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable cavitation dose with harmonics (SCD h ) was for volumetric oscillation; inertial cavitation dose (ICD) identified drastic bubble oscillation and bubble collapse; stable cavitation dose with ultraharmonics (SCD u ) was thought to identify asymmetric oscillation and shell waves [23]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of cavitation dose (SCD h , stable cavitation dose using harmonics; SCD u , stable cavitation dose using ultraharmonics; ICD, inertial cavitation dose) were quantified as described previously [22, 23]. First, each pulse of the PCD signal was calculated into the frequency spectrum in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-seconds-long PCD signals were acquired before the microbubbles injections and used as a control baseline. The stable cavitation dose using harmonics (SCDh) was quantified based on the previous method (Wu et al; 2014). For the standard waveform, the harmonic signal (n*f; n = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; f = 1.5 MHz; maximum amplitude within a bandwidth of 200 Hz around the harmonic frequency) was filtered after taking the root mean square (RMS) of the voltage spectral amplitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%