Transcending capitalism growth strategies for biodiversity conservation

Abstract

The unlimited economic growth that fuels capitalism's metabolism has profoundly transformed a large portion of Earth. The resulting environmental destruction has led to an unprecedented rate of biodiversity loss. Following large-scale losses of habitats and species, it was recognized that biodiversity is crucial to maintaining functional ecosystems. We sought to continue the debate on the contradictions between economic growth and biodiversity in the conservation science literature and thus invite scholars to engage in reversing the biodiversity crisis through acknowledging the impacts of economic growth. In the 1970s, a global agenda was set to develop different milestones related to sustainable development, including green-blue economic growth, which despite not specifically addressing biodiversity reinforced the idea that economic development based on profit is compatible with the planet's ecology. Only after biodiversity loss captured the attention of environmental sciences researchers in the early 2000s was a global biodiversity agenda implemented. The agenda highlights biodiversity conservation as a major international challenge and recognizes that the main drivers of biodiversity loss derive from economic activities. The post-2000 biodiversity agendas, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the post-2020 Convention on Biological Diversity Global Strategy Framework, do not consider the negative impacts of growth-oriented strategies on biodiversity. As a result, global biodiversity conservation priorities are governed by the economic value of biodiversity and its assumed contribution to people's welfare. A large body of empirical evidence shows that unlimited economic growth is the main driver of biodiversity loss in the Anthropocene; thus, we strongly argue for sustainable degrowth and a fundamental shift in societal values. An equitable downscaling of the physical economy can improve ecological conditions, thus reducing biodiversity loss and consequently enhancing human well-being.

Management, Cooperatives and Sustainability: A New Methodological Proposal for a Holistic Analysis

“…The research agenda on the construction of new indicators is broad. The bibliography is already beginning to be very relevant [40,49,57]. Some very recent specific proposals have been presented for the Balearic Islands and Catalan economies, respectively (in the latter case, the indicators have been reduced according to the available sources).…”

Degrowth scenarios for biodiversity? Some methodological steps and a call for collaboration

“…? 2020;Martin et al, 2016;Moranta et al, 2022; and, more in general, the literature on transformative change for biodiversity (Bennett et al, 2016;Chan et al, 2020;IPBES, 2022b) can be coded to derive potential leverage points, e.g. : replacing GDP with wellbeing indicators; establishing national caps to resource imports/exports; promoting work reduction schemes; unleashing relational values about nature; and promoting mindset change from economic to spiritual growth.…”

Short term solutions to biodiversity conservation in portfolio construction: forward looking disclosure and taxonomy-based metrics

“…We have begun to see estimates of the required size of investment; with the Paulson Institute's (Deutz et al 2020) analysis suggesting that reversing the decline in biodiversity by 2030 globally will require spending of between US$ 722-967 billion each year between 2020 and 2030. Yet, until recently, limited attention has been paid to how financial instruments might encourage positive biodiversity outcomes in the 2030 Agenda for 1 The TCFD (2022) is the basis for many legislated carbon regulations: see, for example (Moranta et al 2022, COP15 2022.…”